WMS

The Crow: City of Angels (1996)

Directed by Tim Pope

No — The Crow: City of Angels is not woke, scoring 10 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

The Crow: City of Angels arrives in 1996 as a stand-alone sequel, a moody slab of urban gothic in which a murdered mechanic named Ashe Corven is fished out of a harbor by a crow and set loose upon the drug cartel that killed him and his son.

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting22

The cast includes Thuy Trang, Richard Brooks, and Swiss actor Vincent Perez in prominent roles, but these are natural casting choices for a 1996 genre film with no commentary on identity.

📢
Lecture Energy5

This is a moody gothic action film that preaches nothing; any moralizing is limited to generic revenge-justice tropes.

👑
Feminist Agenda4

Sarah Mohr is a returning co-protagonist, but the film is a male-led revenge narrative; notably, the studio rejected pitches for a female lead, so no feminist agenda is present on screen.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext appear anywhere in the film.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

Race is never a theme or subject of commentary; the diverse cast exists without any racial consciousness framing.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate-related content whatsoever.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The antagonist is a drug kingpin, not a capitalist archetype, and the film offers no economic critique.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body positivity themes; the film traffics in gothic, violent imagery of physical suffering.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergent characters or themes are present.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a supernatural revenge fantasy with no historical subject matter to revise.

Why it received this score

The Crow: City of Angels arrives in 1996 as a stand-alone sequel, a moody slab of urban gothic in which a murdered mechanic named Ashe Corven is fished out of a harbor by a crow and set loose upon the drug cartel that killed him and his son. Tim Pope, a music video director, gives the thing a wet, blue-black sheen, and Vincent Perez broods handsomely in face paint. The film was, by most accounts, taken from him in the editing room by the Weinsteins, who wanted a structure that matched the 1994 original. What reached theaters is a sloppy pretender, as the reviewers of the day agreed, though the cinematography retains its defenders.

The interesting material sits behind the camera. James O'Barr pitched a sequel built around a resurrected bride, and David Goyer agreed to write only if the protagonist were a woman. Miramax rejected both, reportedly on the grounds that nobody would pay to see an action film with a female lead. What we got instead is a father's revenge story, and Sarah Mohr, the returning tattoo artist, occupies a supporting position in a narrative that belongs to a man. That production history is worth recording. The finished film carries no feminist argument whatsoever. It carries leather, rain, and a body count.

The cast is diverse by the standards of its moment, with Thuy Trang, Richard Brooks, and a Swiss lead, and the script never remarks upon any of it. No character pauses to explain what their presence signifies. Race is not a subject here, nor is sexuality, nor the climate, nor the body, nor the mind's varied wiring. Judah Earl is a drug lord, and the film holds no interest in economics. The moral register is vengeance, delivered without a sermon. It is a grim, pretty, mostly unsuccessful genre exercise that asks nothing of its audience except patience. The sommelier notes a thin vintage, poured into a heavy glass.

{"thematic_tags": ["sequel", "superhero", "book_adaptation", "box_office_number_one"]}

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Tim Pope
Cast: Vincent Perez, Mia Kirshner, Iggy Pop, Thomas Jane, Richard Brooks, Thuy Trang, Vincent Castellanos, Tracey Ellis
Genres: Action, Fantasy, Thriller
Studios: Dimension Films, Miramax, Bad Bird Productions, Image Comics, Jeff Most Productions
Franchise: The Crow Collection

Synopsis

A murder victim is brought back to life by a mysterious crow. With the help of a beautiful woman, he exacts revenge on his killers – only to realize his enemy has discovered the one weakness that can destroy him forever.

Questions about The Crow: City of Angels

Is The Crow: City of Angels woke?

No — The Crow: City of Angels is not woke, scoring 10 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does The Crow: City of Angels have any woke elements?

Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Representation Casting at 22.

How does The Crow: City of Angels compare to other 1996 movies?

It ranks #34 of the 93 films from 1996 we've scored; their average is 11. The wokest is Bound (60).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings