WMS

Tarzan (2013)

Directed by Reinhard Klooss

No — Tarzan is not especially woke, scoring 21 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Reinhard Klooss has taken Edgar Rice Burroughs' durable colonial fantasy and outfitted it with a villain who runs an energy conglomerate.

Consciousness Markers

💰
Eat the Rich50

The villain is the greedy CEO of Greystoke Energies who deploys a mercenary army to exploit the meteor for profit, a textbook evil-corporation antagonist that critics explicitly read as a capitalist-versus-tree-hugger conflict.

🌱
Climate Crusade25

The plot centers on protecting an energy-rich meteor and the jungle, with Jane working for a conservation group and the couple vowing to protect the forest, giving it a mild environmentalist bent rather than an explicit climate message.

📢
Lecture Energy20

The environmental and anti-corporate themes are present but delivered through action and an over-explanatory narrator rather than as a sustained moral lecture.

👑
Feminist Agenda12

Jane is given modest agency — she rescues a safari client, works for a conservation group, and shows disgust at Clayton's greed — but she remains primarily a love interest and damsel to be rescued.

🎭
Representation Casting0

The voice cast is uniformly white and the film makes no effort at diverse or color-conscious casting; the African setting is populated almost entirely by apes and white explorers.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters, relationships, or subtext of any kind appear in the film.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

Despite its African setting, the film engages no racial themes, history, or consciousness; the story is a colonial-era adventure fantasy with no commentary on race.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes or diverse body representations are present.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergent characters or themes are depicted.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a straightforward adaptation of a fictional adventure story and makes no revisionist claims about real history.

Why it received this score

Reinhard Klooss has taken Edgar Rice Burroughs' durable colonial fantasy and outfitted it with a villain who runs an energy conglomerate. William Clayton, chief executive of Greystoke Energies, sends a private army to seize a meteor because the meteor is worth money. The film does not complicate this arrangement. He is greedy, the jungle is good, and the collision between the two supplies the entire moral architecture. There is a conservation group, a closing vow to protect the forest, and a hero who screams at his animal friends to come and fight. The environmental sentiment is genuine enough, carried by action set pieces and a narrator who explains everything twice, but it never hardens into a sermon. The audience is trusted to notice that the corporation is bad.

Jane Porter has been granted slightly more than the role traditionally allows. She rescues a straying safari client from a cassowary, she draws a paycheck from a conservation outfit, she recoils visibly from Clayton's avarice. Then the plot remembers itself, and she is bound and left on a meteor, awaiting rescue. The agency is a garnish, not a meal.

Elsewhere the film is content to be a 2013 computer-animated adventure with motion capture, a 20 percent approval rating, and a narration track that will not stop. The African setting is populated by apes, a glowing rock, and white explorers. Nobody involved appears to have considered that a story set in Uganda might include Ugandans. The voice cast is uniformly pale. There are no queer characters, no body diversity, no neurodivergent figures, no reckoning with the racial history that clings to this particular property like humidity. That leaves a serviceable lesson about corporate greed, wrapped in a jungle drained of everything else it once held.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Reinhard Klooss
Cast: Kellan Lutz, Spencer Locke, Les Bubb, Joe Cappelletti, Brian Huskey, Mark Deklin, Jaime Ray Newman, Robert Capron
Genres: Animation, Action, Adventure, Family
Studios: Ambient Entertainment, Constantin Film, Summit Entertainment

Synopsis

One of the most classic and revered stories of all time, Edgar Rice Burroughs' Tarzan returns to the big screen for a new generation. Tarzan and Jane face a mercenary army dispatched by the evil CEO of Greystoke Energies, a man who took over the company from Tarzan's parents, after they died in a plane crash in the African jungle.

Questions about Tarzan

Is Tarzan woke?

No — Tarzan is not especially woke, scoring 21 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Based.

Does Tarzan have any woke elements?

1 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Eat the Rich (50). On Eat the Rich: The villain is the greedy CEO of Greystoke Energies who deploys a mercenary army to exploit the meteor for profit, a textbook evil-corporation antagonist that critics explicitly read as a capitalist-versus-tree-hugger conflict.

How does Tarzan compare to other 2013 movies?

It ranks #57 of the 274 films from 2013 we've scored; their average is 14. The wokest is Belle (76).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings