WMS

Like Father, Like Son (2013)

Directed by Hirokazu Kore-eda

No — Like Father, Like Son is not woke, scoring 8 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Like Father, Like Son arrives from 2013 with the quiet confidence of a film that has no interest in being measured by the cultural anxieties of a later decade.

Consciousness Markers

💰
Eat the Rich15

Ryota is characterized as a money-driven businessman whose materialist values are implicitly contrasted with the warmer, poorer Saiki family, offering a mild critique of wealth and status. It is a quiet thematic undercurrent rather than an eat-the-rich polemic.

📢
Lecture Energy10

Kore-eda's style is observational and restrained, letting themes emerge through nuance rather than speeches. There is little overt moralizing or direct address to the audience.

👑
Feminist Agenda8

The film touches on the mother's bond and gently critiques Ryota's neglect of his wife, but this is humanist family drama rather than a feminist agenda. No explicit gender-politics framework is advanced.

🎭
Representation Casting0

The cast is entirely Japanese, which is simply the natural demographic of a Japanese-language domestic drama rather than a deliberate diversity-casting initiative. No representation-casting intent is present.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

There are no LGBTQ+ characters, relationships, or themes anywhere in the film.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

The central tension is class difference between the wealthy Nonomiyas and the small-town Saikis, not race. No racial consciousness or commentary is present.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

There is no environmental or climate theme in the film.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes or messaging appear in the film.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergence is depicted or discussed.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a fictional domestic drama with no historical revisionism.

Why it received this score

Like Father, Like Son arrives from 2013 with the quiet confidence of a film that has no interest in being measured by the cultural anxieties of a later decade. Hirokazu Kore-eda tells the story of two families whose infant sons were switched at birth, and the moral dilemma that follows is intimate, parental, and rooted in class. Ryota is a successful architect, driven by money and status. The Saikis are small-town people with less income and more warmth. The film watches them negotiate an impossible choice without turning anyone into a case study.

The cast is entirely Japanese because the story is a Japanese domestic drama, not because anyone was filling a quota. There are no LGBTQ themes, no racial-consciousness project, no climate crusade, no body-positivity message, no neurodivergent subplot, and no revisionist history. The faintest social critique is economic. Ryota's materialism is set against the Saikis' emotional generosity, which amounts to a mild suspicion of wealth and status, not a call to eat the rich. The film also notices that Ryota neglects his wife, and it values the mother's bond, but this is humanist family observation, not a feminist manifesto. Kore-eda's restraint keeps the lecture energy low. He prefers a long shot of a child's camera to a speech about what we owe each other.

That restraint is the film's saving grace and its limitation as a specimen of modern social consciousness. It asks us to sit with ambiguity. It does not instruct us. The result is a serious, moving piece of cinema that would score poorly on any contemporary checklist and remain entirely untroubled by that fact. A temperate vintage. Drink it with dinner and discuss inheritance, class, and the limits of paternal pride. Just do not expect a sermon.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Hirokazu Kore-eda
Cast: Masaharu Fukuyama, Machiko Ono, Yoko Maki, Lily Franky, Jun Fubuki, Jun Kunimura, Kirin Kiki, Isao Natsuyagi
Genres: Drama
Studios: Fuji Television Network, BUN-BUKU, AMUSE, GAGA Corporation

Synopsis

Ryota Nonomiya is a successful businessman driven by money. He learns that his biological son was switched with another child after birth. He must make a life-changing decision and choose his true son or the boy he raised as his own.

Questions about Like Father, Like Son

Is Like Father, Like Son woke?

No — Like Father, Like Son is not woke, scoring 8 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does Like Father, Like Son have any woke elements?

Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Eat the Rich at 15.

How does Like Father, Like Son compare to other 2013 movies?

It ranks #137 of the 274 films from 2013 we've scored; their average is 14. The wokest is Belle (76).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings