WMS

I Give It a Year (2013)

Directed by Dan Mazer

No — I Give It a Year is not woke, scoring 5 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Dan Mazer's I Give It a Year arrives as a brisk 2013 anti-romance, set in London and built on a simple cruel joke.

Consciousness Markers

👑
Feminist Agenda8

Nat is an ambitious advertising executive, but the film treats her career mostly as a source of marital friction rather than advancing any feminist argument.

📢
Lecture Energy5

Mazer's film is cynical and rude rather than preachy; it offers no moralizing message, only a sour anti-romance punchline.

🎭
Representation Casting0

The cast is a uniformly white ensemble of British and American comedic actors; no meaningful diverse casting or representation is present.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

There are no LGBTQ+ characters or themes; the plot is entirely built around heterosexual marriage and infidelity.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

Race is never addressed or thematized; the film operates in a wholly white, raceless comedic register.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate content whatsoever.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The film's satire targets marriage and romance, not wealth or capitalism; the solvent-business subplot is incidental.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes; the lingerie-shop gags are played for farce rather than body acceptance.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergent characters or themes are present.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a contemporary fictional comedy with no historical subject matter to revise.

Why it received this score

Dan Mazer's I Give It a Year arrives as a brisk 2013 anti-romance, set in London and built on a simple cruel joke. Nat, an advertising executive played by Rose Byrne, and Josh, a struggling writer played by Rafe Spall, marry after seven months and spend the next year discovering they cannot stand each other. The cast is a uniformly white ensemble of British and American comedic performers. Race never enters the frame. Neither does any LGBTQ thread. The entire engine is heterosexual marriage, temptation, and eventual partner swap. It is a comedy of manners with no manners, which is the kindest description of its moral position.

Nat's ambition as an advertising executive is present, but the film treats her career mostly as a source of marital friction. That gives it a faint flicker of feminist possibility, no more. The solvent business subplot exists to put her near Guy, not to examine wealth. The lingerie shop sequence plays as farce, not body acceptance. No neurodivergent characters appear. No climate anxiety intrudes. No historical record is revised. The film operates in a wholly white, raceless register, and its romantic assumptions are entirely conventional. It is not preachy. It is sour. The moralizing impulse is minimal because Mazer has no sermon to deliver, only a punchline about how wrong two people can be for each other.

By the end, Josh and Nat ask for a divorce with visible relief, then cheerfully pursue Chloe and Guy. The film is rude, brisk, and committed to incompatibility. It offers no progressive blueprint, no moral instruction, no call to improve the viewer. The remainder is a modest British comedy that wants to be funny about marrying the wrong person. It succeeds often enough to be watchable and fails often enough to be forgotten. In the ledger of social consciousness, it is mostly blank, with only Nat's career and the film's cynical bite registering as faint traces. The rest is wedding gifts, bad speeches, and the quiet horror of a honeymoon story told twice.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Dan Mazer
Genres: Comedy, Romance
Studios: Paradis Films, StudioCanal, Working Title, Anton Capital Entertainment, LOVEFiLM International, Starcrossed Films, TF1 Films Production

Synopsis

After a quick courtship, two lovers hastily decide to tie the knot. As their first year of marriage unfolds, temptation and incompatibility put their relationship in jeopardy.

Questions about I Give It a Year

Is I Give It a Year woke?

No — I Give It a Year is not woke, scoring 5 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does I Give It a Year have any woke elements?

Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Feminist Agenda at 8.

How does I Give It a Year compare to other 2013 movies?

It ranks #197 of the 274 films from 2013 we've scored; their average is 14. The wokest is Belle (76).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings