WMS

Fun with Dick and Jane (2005)

Directed by Dean Parisot

No — Fun with Dick and Jane is not especially woke, scoring 24 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Dean Parisot's 2005 remake arrives with a grievance and a grin, and it is never entirely sure which one should lead.

Consciousness Markers

💰
Eat the Rich72

The entire engine of the plot is an Enron-style corporate collapse: a CEO dumps his stock, embezzles $400 million, destroys pensions, and leaves employees to take the fall, with the heroes literally robbing the rich to restore the stolen pension fund.

📢
Lecture Energy22

The film gestures at corporate malfeasance and includes a Ralph Nader cameo and 'perverting the American dream' rhetoric, but it delivers these as gags rather than sermons, keeping the preaching light.

👑
Feminist Agenda18

Jane is a genuine co-protagonist who quits her travel-agent job, becomes an equal partner in the robbery spree, and uses her calligraphy skill for the climactic forgery, but the film frames this as screwball-comedy teamwork rather than a feminist statement.

🎭
Representation Casting12

The cast is overwhelmingly white, with only incidental background Latino performers (a maid, a border-crossing sequence) and no meaningful non-white roles; diversity is not a stated concern of the film.

✊
Racial Consciousness8

Dick's deportation to Mexico and border re-crossing is played purely for slapstick humiliation, with no engagement with race, immigration policy, or systemic inequality.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext appear anywhere in the film.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate themes whatsoever.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes; physical comedy relies on conventional gags rather than body-diversity messaging.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergent characters or themes are present.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a fictional satire inspired by contemporaneous corporate scandals, not a revisionist retelling of historical events.

Why it received this score

Dean Parisot's 2005 remake arrives with a grievance and a grin, and it is never entirely sure which one should lead. The engine is a corporate collapse modeled so closely on Enron that the audience could fill in the names: a chief executive dumps his shares, diverts four hundred million dollars, and leaves the pension fund in ashes while his employees absorb the blame. That is a substantial reservoir of class resentment, and the film draws from it freely. Carrey and Leoni spend the middle act robbing the comfortable to service the debts of the ruined, a premise with teeth.

Yet the teeth are capped. The screenplay, worked over by an army of uncredited writers, keeps reaching for the sermon and then yanking its hand back, treating the larceny as farce. A Ralph Nader cameo and a line about perverting the American dream land as punchlines. The rage is genuine but housebroken. Téa Leoni is not a decorative wife. She quits her job, matches her husband heist for heist, and her college calligraphy supplies the climactic forgery. The film frames this as screwball partnership, two professionals sharing a scheme, and declines to make an argument of it.

What the picture does not do is read its own era's cultural cues. The cast is white throughout, with Latino performers appearing as a maid and as the officers who deport Dick, and his crawl back across the border is staged as humiliation, with no curiosity about what that border means to anyone. There is no environmental conscience, no interest in bodies beyond the pratfall, no inner life beyond the paycheck. The closing joke, a friend announcing his wonderful new job at Enron, is the nearest thing to a thesis: the swindle is cyclical and the swindlers are fine. A comedy about being robbed, made by people who suspected it would happen again.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Dean Parisot
Cast: Jim Carrey, Téa Leoni, Alec Baldwin, Richard Jenkins, John Michael Higgins, Angie Harmon, Richard Burgi, Carlos Jacott
Genres: Comedy, Crime
Studios: JC 23 Entertainment, Imagine Entertainment, Columbia Pictures, Bart/Palevsky Productions

Synopsis

After Dick Harper loses his job at Globodyne in an Enron-esque collapse, he and his wife, Jane, turn to crime in order to handle the massive debt they now face. Two intelligent people, Dick and Jane actually get pretty good at robbing people and even enjoy it – but they have second thoughts when they're reminded that crime can hurt innocent people. When the couple hears that Globodyne boss Jack McCallister actually swindled the company, they plot revenge.

Questions about Fun with Dick and Jane

Is Fun with Dick and Jane woke?

No — Fun with Dick and Jane is not especially woke, scoring 24 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Based.

Does Fun with Dick and Jane have any woke elements?

1 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Eat the Rich (72). On Eat the Rich: The entire engine of the plot is an Enron-style corporate collapse: a CEO dumps his stock, embezzles $400 million, destroys pensions, and leaves employees to take the fall, with the heroes literally robbing the rich to restore the stolen pension fund.

How does Fun with Dick and Jane compare to other 2005 movies?

It ranks #24 of the 181 films from 2005 we've scored; their average is 13. The wokest is The Constant Gardener (72).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings