
Doom (2005)
Directed by Andrzej Bartkowiak
No — Doom is not woke, scoring 10 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.
Doom arrives from 2005, a year when the video game adaptation was still a genre of quiet shame, and it does little to disturb that reputation.
Consciousness Markers
The cast includes Dwayne Johnson, Deobia Oparei, and Razaaq Adoti in prominent roles, but their presence is not framed as a progressive statement.
Rosamund Pike plays a capable scientist, but the film does not advance a feminist agenda.
The UAC is an unethical corporation, but the film does not develop an anti-capitalist critique.
No LGBTQ+ characters or themes.
No exploration of racial issues or consciousness.
No environmental or climate themes.
No body positivity themes.
No neurodivergence themes.
No revisionist history.
No preachy or lecture-like social messaging.
Why it received this score
Doom arrives from 2005, a year when the video game adaptation was still a genre of quiet shame, and it does little to disturb that reputation. Andrzej Bartkowiak directs a squad of marines toward a Martian research facility, where an unethical corporation has been splicing ancient chromosomes into convicted murderers and discovering, to no one's surprise, that this produces monsters. The plot is largely an excuse for corridors, muzzle flashes, and a first person sequence that remains the film's only genuine claim to invention. As cultural commentary it is nearly silent.
The cast is more varied than the era's action norms, with Dwayne Johnson, Deobia Oparei, and Razaaq Adoti filling out the squad, though the film treats their presence as simple casting and never as a statement. Rosamund Pike plays Dr. Samantha Grimm, a scientist of evident competence, and the screenplay allows her to do laboratory work and deliver exposition without ever suggesting a thesis about women in science. The Union Aerospace Corporation is plainly villainous, a company that experiments on people and worries chiefly about data retrieval, but the film has no interest in following that thread toward any economic argument. It simply needs a faceless employer to be reckless.
What remains is a lean, loud, and thoroughly unserious exercise in creature feature mechanics. There is no sermon here, no moral instruction, no attempt to educate the audience about anything beyond the dangers of standing near a ventilation shaft. Roger Ebert compared it to a child monopolizing your computer, which is unkind but not inaccurate. The film was a box office failure, critically dismissed, and later disowned by several of its own participants. For a taxonomy of social messaging, it offers almost nothing to measure, which is itself a kind of data point.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Synopsis
A team of space marines known as the Rapid Response Tactical Squad, led by Sarge, is sent to a science facility on Mars after somebody reports a security breach. There, they learn that the alert came after a test subject, a mass murderer purposefully injected with alien DNA, broke free and began killing people. Dr. Grimm, who is related to team member Reaper, informs them all that the chromosome can mutate humans into monsters -- and is highly infectious.
Questions about Doom
Is Doom woke?
No — Doom is not woke, scoring 10 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.
Does Doom have any woke elements?
Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Representation Casting at 20.
How does Doom compare to other 2005 movies?
It ranks #76 of the 181 films from 2005 we've scored; their average is 13. The wokest is The Constant Gardener (72).
How is the Woke Score calculated?
An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.