WMS

Blue Jasmine (2013)

Directed by Woody Allen

No — Blue Jasmine is not especially woke, scoring 26 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Woody Allen's Blue Jasmine arrives with the weary elegance of a woman who has misplaced her luggage and her entire moral ledger.

Consciousness Markers

💰
Eat the Rich40

The plot explicitly contrasts wealthy Manhattan society with working-class San Francisco life and centers on a Madoff-style financial fraud that devastates ordinary victims, though it remains a character study rather than a systemic anti-capitalist manifesto.

👑
Feminist Agenda30

The narrative centers on two women and includes a workplace sexual-harassment episode and a sister's romantic agency, but these are framed as character drama rather than an explicit feminist statement.

🧠
Neurodivergence30

Jasmine's nervous breakdown, anxiety, medication abuse, and self-talk are central to the character study, giving mental distress a prominent place in the narrative.

🎭
Representation Casting25

The film is led by two women, Cate Blanchett and Sally Hawkins, but the cast is otherwise largely white and conventional, with no deliberate emphasis on racial or ethnic inclusivity.

📢
Lecture Energy15

Social themes about class, wealth, and narcissism are embedded in character and dialogue rather than delivered as direct preaching.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

There are no LGBTQ+ characters, relationships, or themes in the film.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

The film features an all-white principal cast and does not engage with racial identity or racial justice themes.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

There is no environmental or climate-related content in the film.

💗
Body Positivity0

The film does not address body positivity, body image, or size diversity as themes.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a fictional story and does not revise or reinterpret historical events or figures.

Why it received this score

Woody Allen's Blue Jasmine arrives with the weary elegance of a woman who has misplaced her luggage and her entire moral ledger. Cate Blanchett plays Jasmine, a Manhattan socialite deposited in San Francisco after her financier husband's fraud collapses and he hangs himself in prison. The film tracks her descent with the patience of a coroner. It is a character study first and a social document second, which is why its class politics register as texture instead of thesis. The gulf between Hal's stolen millions and Ginger's working-class apartment is drawn sharply, but Allen never steps outside the frame to explain the moral. He trusts the wreckage to speak for itself.

The film is carried by two women, and the camera is content to let them carry it. Jasmine's brief employment under a handsy dentist supplies a workplace-harassment episode, and Ginger's romantic choices are treated as her own, though neither thread is staged as an argument. Mental distress occupies the center of the frame: the panic, the pills, the muttering on park benches. Allen renders Jasmine's collapse as pathology and personality at once, which keeps it from becoming a public-service announcement. The sermonizing stays minimal. Ideas about wealth and narcissism arrive through dialogue and behavior, not from a lectern.

Elsewhere the film is conspicuously silent. Its principal cast is white, its concerns are domestic and financial, and it shows no interest in the environment, in body image, or in the reinterpretation of history. The result is a finely acted portrait of self-destruction that predates most of the cultural preoccupations we now bring to it. It remains a sommelier's problem: a difficult vintage, expertly cellared, offering little to the contemporary palate beyond craft and one remarkable performance.

We file it accordingly, with a sigh and a clean glass.

Thematic tags: oscar_winner (Blanchett won Best Actress). No sequel, remake, superhero, or adaptation applies. The Madoff parallel is inspiration, not a true story, and the film never reached number one domestically.

The scoring reflects a film of high craft and low contemporary signaling. Representation rests on two female leads in an otherwise conventional white cast. Feminist and anti-capitalist currents exist as subplot and setting. Neurodivergence is genuinely central, since the heroine's anxiety and medication abuse drive the entire narrative. The remaining markers are absent, and absence is a finding, not a failure of research.

{"review": "Woody Allen's Blue Jasmine arrives with the weary elegance of a woman who has misplaced her luggage and her entire moral ledger. Cate Blanchett plays Jasmine, a Manhattan socialite deposited in San Francisco after her financier husband's fraud collapses and he hangs himself in prison. The film tracks her descent with the patience of a coroner. It is a character study first and a social document second, which is why its class politics register as texture instead of thesis. The gulf between Hal's stolen millions and Ginger's working-class apartment is drawn sharply, but Allen never steps outside the frame to explain the moral. He trusts the wreckage to speak for itself. The film is carried by two women, and the camera is content to let them carry it. Jasmine's brief employment under a handsy dentist supplies a workplace-harassment episode, and Ginger's romantic choices are treated as her own, though neither thread is staged as an argument. Mental distress occupies the center of the frame: the panic, the pills, the muttering on park benches. Allen renders Jasmine's collapse as pathology and personality at once, which keeps it from becoming a public-service announcement. The sermonizing stays minimal. Ideas about wealth and narcissism arrive through dialogue and behavior, not from a lectern. Elsewhere the film is conspicuously silent. Its principal cast is white, its concerns are domestic and financial, and it shows no interest in the environment, in body image, or in the reinterpretation of history. The result is a finely acted portrait of self-destruction that predates most of the cultural preoccupations we now bring to it. It remains a sommelier's problem: a difficult vintage, expertly cellared, offering little to the contemporary palate beyond craft and one remarkable performance.", "thematic_tags": ["oscar_winner"]}

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score

Synopsis

After experiencing a traumatic misfortune, Jasmine French, a wealthy woman from New York, moves to San Francisco to live with her foster sister Ginger and the firm purpose of getting a new life, but she will be haunted by anxiety and memories of the past.

Questions about Blue Jasmine

Is Blue Jasmine woke?

No — Blue Jasmine is not especially woke, scoring 26 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Based.

Does Blue Jasmine have any woke elements?

3 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Eat the Rich (40), Feminist Agenda (30) and Neurodivergence (30). On Eat the Rich: The plot explicitly contrasts wealthy Manhattan society with working-class San Francisco life and centers on a Madoff-style financial fraud that devastates ordinary victims, though it remains a character study rather than a systemic anti-capitalist manifesto.

How does Blue Jasmine compare to other 2013 movies?

It ranks #40 of the 274 films from 2013 we've scored; their average is 14. The wokest is Belle (76).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings