WMS

The Purity of Vengeance (2018)

Directed by Christoffer Boe

No — The Purity of Vengeance is not especially woke, scoring 33 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

The fourth installment in the Department Q series arrives with the weary confidence of a franchise that knows its audience and has stopped trying to surprise them.

Consciousness Markers

✊
Racial Consciousness45

Dr. Wad's eugenicist society is revealed to be sterilizing women specifically from immigrant backgrounds, and the immigrant character Nour is a victim. This gives the film a concrete racial/ethnic dimension, though it is woven into the mystery rather than lectured.

👑
Feminist Agenda40

The plot centers on the forced sterilization and reproductive abuse of girls and women at Sprogø, and includes a subplot about Nour's abortion and her coerced sterilization. Bodily autonomy is a genuine thematic engine, though framed as crime-thriller atrocity rather than explicit advocacy.

🎭
Representation Casting35

The cast is Nordic, but the film features Assad, a Middle Eastern-origin lead detective, and Nour, an immigrant-background woman whose storyline drives the climax. These characters exist naturally within the crime narrative rather than as box-ticking additions.

📖
Revisionist History30

The film dramatizes Denmark's real history of forced sterilization at the Sprogø institution and secret hearings, exposing a suppressed national chapter. It is historical atrocity rendered as fiction rather than ideological reinterpretation, so the marker registers only modestly.

📢
Lecture Energy25

The film carries a clear moral indictment of eugenics and institutional abuse, but delivers it through thriller mechanics and investigation rather than direct sermonizing. The message is present but not preachy.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ themes. Rita's assault of Nete is depicted as abuse within an institution, not as queer representation or commentary.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate themes whatsoever.

💰
Eat the Rich0

No critique of capitalism or wealth. The villains are eugenicists and state institutions, not economic actors.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes present.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergence themes or characters.

Why it received this score

The fourth installment in the Department Q series arrives with the weary confidence of a franchise that knows its audience and has stopped trying to surprise them. Christoffer Boe's film opens on a wall being broken through and three mummified bodies seated at a dinner table, which is the sort of image Nordic noir produces the way other cinemas produce car chases. What follows is a cold case reaching back to Sprogø, the Danish island where the state once warehoused girls it found inconvenient and sterilized them for their trouble. The film treats this history with a straight face, which is the correct approach. Denmark did this. The film simply refuses to look away.

The cast is Nordic and the leads are quietly competent, though the series has long carried Fares Fares as Assad, a detective of Middle Eastern origin whose presence nobody remarks upon, a small mercy. The fresher addition is Nour, an immigrant-background woman whose abortion and subsequent coerced sterilization pull the mystery toward a real question about who gets to decide which women reproduce. Dr. Wad's eugenicist society has been quietly sterilizing women from immigrant backgrounds, and the film lets this land as horror rather than sermon. The reproductive cruelty at the center of the story is genuine and specific, drawn from a real institutional practice and deployed as the engine of a revenge plot.

There is a moral indictment here, unmistakably. It arrives through interrogations and ferry rides and henbane-laced tea, not through a character turning to the camera to explain the lesson. That restraint is worth something. The result is a competent thriller with a suppressed national atrocity at its center and a body count that happens to be mostly women. It is not a lecture. It is a crime story that has read the case file and found it sufficiently damning on its own.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score

Part of

Director: Christoffer Boe
Cast: Nikolaj Lie Kaas, Fares Fares, Johanne Louise Schmidt, Søren Pilmark, Fanny Leander Bornedal, Clara Rosager, Luise Skov, Amanda Radeljak
Genres: Crime, Thriller, Mystery, Drama
Studios: Zentropa Entertainments, Film i Väst, TV 2, ZDF, TV4, TV 2, TrustNordisk, FilmFyn, nordmedia, Det Danske Filminstitut, Filmförderung Hamburg Schleswig-Holstein

Synopsis

Copenhagen, 2018. A frightening discovery is made in an old apartment. The subsequent investigation of Department Q leads them to an infamous institution for girls that was suddenly closed in the early sixties.

Questions about The Purity of Vengeance

Is The Purity of Vengeance woke?

No — The Purity of Vengeance is not especially woke, scoring 33 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Based.

Does The Purity of Vengeance have any woke elements?

4 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Racial Consciousness (45), Feminist Agenda (40) and Representation Casting (35). On Racial Consciousness: Dr.

How does The Purity of Vengeance compare to other 2018 movies?

It ranks #64 of the 325 films from 2018 we've scored; their average is 20. The wokest is Return (92).

Is The Purity of Vengeance the most woke Department Q movie?

Yes. It scores highest of the 4 Department Q films we've scored.

Related rankings