
Take the Money and Run (1969)
Directed by Woody Allen
No — Take the Money and Run is not woke, scoring 3 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.
Take the Money and Run arrives in 1969, before the cultural apparatus that now governs our viewing habits had been fully assembled.
Consciousness Markers
The cast is overwhelmingly white and the film makes no effort at inclusive or diverse casting.
There are no LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext.
Women appear mainly as wives, girlfriends, or comic obstacles; no feminist agenda is present.
Two Black prisoners appear in a chain-gang scene, but race is not commented on or made thematic.
The film contains no environmental or climate-related content.
Bank robbery is treated as slapstick criminal incompetence, not as an anti-capitalist critique.
There is no body-positivity theme or messaging.
Virgil is clumsy and socially awkward for comic effect, but the film does not frame this as neurodivergence.
The film is a fictional mockumentary and does not revise or reinterpret historical events.
The film is a gag-driven comedy with no preachy or lecture-like messaging.
Why it received this score
Take the Money and Run arrives in 1969, before the cultural apparatus that now governs our viewing habits had been fully assembled. Woody Allen's second outing as director is a mockumentary concerning Virgil Starkwell, a bank robber of surpassing incompetence, and it devotes itself entirely to the pursuit of laughter. There is no thesis to be located here, no argument about the arrangement of society, only a man whose gun turns out to be a cigarette lighter and whose demand note is legible to no one.
The supporting material is instructive chiefly for how little it signifies. Two Black prisoners appear on the chain gang, and the film declines to comment on their presence. Women arrive as girlfriends, wives, and one blackmailer with designs on the protagonist, and the picture shows no interest in their interiority. Virgil's clumsiness and social awkwardness are comic machinery, not a portrait of a mind that works differently. Bank robbery occasions slapstick instead of an indictment of finance. Allen has said he wanted every inch of the film to be a laugh, and he got what he wanted. The result is a picture that operates as a sustained gag with no social instruction attached to it.
Viewers who arrive expecting a sermon will find none. The film asks nothing of its audience beyond attention to a running joke about a man carving soap. In the ledger of contemporary cultural markers it registers a flat nothing across every column, and there is something restful in that. It is a comedy from a period when comedies were permitted to be merely funny, and it offers no apology for the fact.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Synopsis
Virgil Starkwell is intent on becoming a notorious bank robber. Unfortunately for Virgil and his not-so-budding career, he is completely incompetent.
Questions about Take the Money and Run
Is Take the Money and Run woke?
No — Take the Money and Run is not woke, scoring 3 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.
Does Take the Money and Run have any woke elements?
No. All 10 markers score zero.
How does Take the Money and Run compare to other 1969 movies?
It ranks #9 of the 13 films from 1969 we've scored; their average is 6. The wokest is Midnight Cowboy (22).
How is the Woke Score calculated?
An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.