
Krull (1983)
Directed by Peter Yates
No — Krull is not woke, scoring 3 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.
There is a particular kind of 1983 British fantasy epic that arrives with a mountain-shaped spaceship, a five-pointed throwing star, and the quiet confidence that nobody will ask too many questions.
Consciousness Markers
Princess Lyssa is largely a damsel-in-distress to be rescued, and the production explicitly rejected making her a villain because they didn't want her to be 'less than pure'; the Widow of the Web offers a faint counterpoint as a powerful woman, but the narrative is thoroughly traditional.
The cast is entirely white British actors with no meaningful ethnic diversity; the film makes no attempt at inclusive casting.
There are no LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext anywhere in the film.
The film engages with no racial themes or commentary whatsoever.
No environmental or climate themes are present.
The story is a straightforward good-versus-evil fantasy with no economic or class critique.
No body-positivity themes; the film adheres to conventional fantasy beauty standards.
No neurodivergent characters or themes are depicted.
The film is set in a wholly invented fantasy world and makes no historical claims to revise.
Krull is pure escapist sword-and-sorcery spectacle with no preachy messaging or moralizing.
Why it received this score
There is a particular kind of 1983 British fantasy epic that arrives with a mountain-shaped spaceship, a five-pointed throwing star, and the quiet confidence that nobody will ask too many questions. Krull is that film. A prince named Colwyn assembles a fellowship of nine thieves, one cyclops, and a magician who turns into a puppy, all to rescue his bride from an alien Beast who teleports his fortress every sunrise. The production reportedly began as a Dungeons and Dragons pitch, which explains the party composition, and ended as a thirty-million-dollar soundstage exercise at Pinewood, which explains the rest. Peter Yates, a director of realistic thrillers, described the experience as complicated. He then took a holiday to the Caribbean mid-shoot. The special effects team waited three weeks for him to return.
The film's cultural ledger is remarkably clean. The cast is uniformly white and British, and no effort was made to suggest otherwise. There are no queer characters, no racial commentary, no climate anxieties, no economic critique, and no body-positivity messaging, which is unsurprising for a sword-and-sorcery picture whose chief moral is that a prophecy about a son who will rule the galaxy should be taken at face value. Princess Lyssa exists to be kidnapped, then to be rescued, then to complete a wedding ritual that grants her and Colwyn the power to manipulate fire. The production briefly considered turning her into the villain but declined, on the grounds that they did not want her to be less than pure. The actress called this boring. She was correct. The Widow of the Web, an exiled enchantress with a dead child and a crystal spider, offers a flicker of something more interesting, and is promptly killed offscreen by the plot.
What remains is spectacle without sermon. The Glaive is thrown once. The cyclops holds a door. Liam Neeson appears, briefly, as a man who dies. Nobody learns anything about society. This is escapism of an older, simpler vintage, and it is almost restful.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Synopsis
A prince and a fellowship of companions set out to rescue his bride from a fortress of alien invaders who have arrived on their home planet.
Questions about Krull
Is Krull woke?
No — Krull is not woke, scoring 3 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.
Does Krull have any woke elements?
Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Feminist Agenda at 5.
How does Krull compare to other 1983 movies?
It ranks #28 of the 38 films from 1983 we've scored; their average is 10. The wokest is Sans Soleil (68).
How is the Woke Score calculated?
An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.