WMS

In Good Company (2004)

Directed by Paul Weitz

No — In Good Company is not woke, scoring 15 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Paul Weitz's In Good Company arrives from 2004, a period piece in which the great villain is not systemic oppression but a mid-level executive named Carter Duryea.

Consciousness Markers

💰
Eat the Rich42

The film's central satirical target is corporate culture — the soulless 'synergy' of the Globecom takeover, mass layoffs, and the demotion of experienced workers for young MBAs — though it ultimately reconciles with the system rather than condemning it.

📢
Lecture Energy18

The corporate satire delivers gentle commentary on generational and business values, but it stays character-driven and sentimental rather than preachy or didactic.

🎭
Representation Casting15

The cast is overwhelmingly white, anchored by Dennis Quaid, Topher Grace, and Scarlett Johansson; Frankie Faison appears in a supporting role as a colleague, but the film makes no comment on representation.

👑
Feminist Agenda8

Alex and Jana are largely defined by their relationships to the male leads, and the wife exists mainly as a pregnancy plot device; there is no feminist critique or agency-driven arc.

✊
Racial Consciousness5

Race is entirely unexamined; a handful of non-white actors populate the office without any racial commentary or theme.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext appear anywhere in the film.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

The film contains no environmental or climate-related content whatsoever.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes or messaging are present.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

There is no depiction or discussion of neurodivergence.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a fictional contemporary story with no historical revisionism.

Why it received this score

Paul Weitz's In Good Company arrives from 2004, a period piece in which the great villain is not systemic oppression but a mid-level executive named Carter Duryea. The film follows Dan Foreman, a fifty-one-year-old ad salesman demoted beneath a twenty-six-year-old business school prodigy after a conglomerate swallows his magazine. The satire here is gentle and specific: Globecom's gospel of synergy, the cross-promotion of sports journalism with snack food and cell phones, the quiet disposal of experienced workers. This is the film's one genuine point of cultural friction, and it earns a respectable measure of suspicion toward corporate consolidation. It also, by the closing reel, forgives the corporation entirely, restoring Dan to his old desk and sending the young man off to jog in the sunlight. The anger is real, but it is housebroken.

Elsewhere the film is content to be a well-mannered romantic comedy. The women are defined by their proximity to the men: a daughter who exists to complicate the mentor relationship, a wife whose pregnancy functions as plot device and mortgage liability. No inquiry is made into race, which is present in the office and absent from the conversation. The cast is white and the sensibility is whiter still. There is no engagement with sexuality, with the body, with neurodivergence, or with the climate, and no attempt to revise any history, this being a story about the present tense of American commerce.

The film lectures only lightly, preferring sentiment to sermon. It wants us to feel the ache of a man replaced by a younger model, and it succeeds, without ever demanding that we dismantle the machine that replaced him. A pleasant film. A safe one. It satirizes the boardroom, then shakes its hand.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score

Synopsis

Dan Foreman is a seasoned advertisement sales executive at a high-ranking publication when a corporate takeover results in him being placed under naive supervisor Carter Duryea, who is half his age. Matters are made worse when Dan's new supervisor becomes romantically involved with his daughter an 18 year-old college student Alex.

Questions about In Good Company

Is In Good Company woke?

No — In Good Company is not woke, scoring 15 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does In Good Company have any woke elements?

1 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Eat the Rich (42). On Eat the Rich: The film's central satirical target is corporate culture — the soulless 'synergy' of the Globecom takeover, mass layoffs, and the demotion of experienced workers for young MBAs — though it ultimately reconciles with the system rather than condemning it.

How does In Good Company compare to other 2004 movies?

It ranks #42 of the 178 films from 2004 we've scored; their average is 12. The wokest is Tropical Malady (62).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings