
Che: Part Two (2008)
Directed by Steven Soderbergh
No — Che: Part Two is not especially woke, scoring 25 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.
Steven Soderbergh's second installment follows Ernesto Guevara into the Bolivian highlands, where the revolution refuses to catch.
Consciousness Markers
Che Guevara is the archetypal communist revolutionary, and the film depicts his insurgency against capitalist and imperialist structures, though as historical biography rather than modern polemic.
The cast is overwhelmingly Latin American, but this reflects authentic casting for a film about Che Guevara and the Bolivian campaign rather than a deliberate diversity initiative. Representation is natural to the subject and never commented upon.
Soderbergh's restrained, procedural style largely shows rather than tells, with little overt preaching despite the political subject matter.
The story engages Latin American anti-imperialism and the plight of indigenous Bolivian peasants, but it is framed through Cold War revolutionary ideology rather than modern racial-identity consciousness.
The film follows Che's own Bolivian diaries closely and offers a largely sympathetic portrait, but it presents itself as grounded historical reconstruction rather than a corrective rewriting of the record.
No LGBTQ+ characters or themes appear anywhere in this guerrilla-war narrative.
The film is a male-dominated chronicle of armed revolution with no feminist framing or women-centered perspective.
Environmental concerns play no role in this historical war drama.
No body-positivity themes or messaging are present.
No neurodivergence themes appear, though the film does depict Che's asthma as a physical ailment.
Why it received this score
Steven Soderbergh's second installment follows Ernesto Guevara into the Bolivian highlands, where the revolution refuses to catch. The film is a procedural in fatigues: supply lines, radio codes, ambushes, the slow attrition of a man and his small column. There is no score to speak of, no montage grandstanding, and no interest in telling us how to feel about any of it. The patient viewer is rewarded with texture, and the impatient viewer is rewarded with a nap.
The political content is unambiguous and also uninterested in making a case. Guevara is a communist insurgent fighting imperial and capitalist machinery, which places a certain amount of class warfare on screen, though as biography instead of sermon. The Bolivian peasants are present as peasants, suffering, unorganized, and largely indifferent to the foreign doctor in their midst. The film notices them without editorializing about identity, which keeps the racial register historical and Cold War shaped, not contemporary. The cast is almost entirely Latin American, and the fact that this registers as unremarkable is the point. Nobody in La Paz stops to explain representation to the audience.
The absences are just as telling. There are no women with interior lives to speak of, no queer characters, no environmental anxieties, no body politics, no neurodivergent framing. Guevara's asthma is a logistical problem, not a metaphor. Soderbergh shows instead of lectures, which in 2008 was already becoming an unfashionable choice and now looks almost eccentric. The result is a war film that trusts its audience and offers them nothing to applaud except the craft. Classification: a period piece of revolutionary history, resistant to the cultural vocabulary of the decade that followed it.
{"thematic_tags": ["sequel", "true_story", "book_adaptation"]}
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Synopsis
Seven years after his triumph in Cuba, Che winds up in Bolivia, where he tries to ignite the same revolutionary fires as before.
Questions about Che: Part Two
Is Che: Part Two woke?
No — Che: Part Two is not especially woke, scoring 25 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Based.
Does Che: Part Two have any woke elements?
2 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Eat the Rich (65) and Representation Casting (30). On Eat the Rich: Che Guevara is the archetypal communist revolutionary, and the film depicts his insurgency against capitalist and imperialist structures, though as historical biography rather than modern polemic.
How does Che: Part Two compare to other 2008 movies?
It ranks #24 of the 212 films from 2008 we've scored; their average is 12. The wokest is Milk (68).
How is the Woke Score calculated?
An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.