WMS

Books of Blood (2020)

Directed by Brannon Braga

No — Books of Blood is not woke, scoring 12 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Brannon Braga's Books of Blood arrives with a respectable pedigree, an adaptation of Clive Barker's horror anthology, and it conducts itself with the grim efficiency of a filmmaker who knows the assignment.

Consciousness Markers

🧠
Neurodivergence30

Jenna is explicitly written with a sensory-processing condition that makes certain noises unbearable, and her arc involves medication noncompliance; the depiction is sympathetic but framed as horror pathology rather than advocacy.

🎭
Representation Casting25

The cast is notably multiethnic (Freda Foh Shen, Yul Vazquez, Andy McQueen, Saad Siddiqui, Kenji Fitzgerald), but the film never comments on race or identity; these are simply working actors in a horror anthology.

👑
Feminist Agenda12

Two of the three segments center on women (Jenna, Mary), but both are framed as victims of manipulation and mutilation rather than vehicles for any feminist argument.

💰
Eat the Rich5

A bookseller's debt to shady lenders and Mary's need to 'raise funding' are incidental plot mechanics, not a critique of capital.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters, relationships, or themes appear anywhere in the three interlocking tales.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

Race is never addressed, thematized, or made a subject of the narrative.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate content whatsoever.

💗
Body Positivity0

The film's treatment of bodies is grotesque horror — paralysis, mutilation, tongues and eyes removed — the opposite of body-positive messaging.

📖
Revisionist History0

No historical events or figures are reinterpreted.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film is a gory anthology with no moralizing, messaging, or sermonizing of any kind.

Why it received this score

Brannon Braga's Books of Blood arrives with a respectable pedigree, an adaptation of Clive Barker's horror anthology, and it conducts itself with the grim efficiency of a filmmaker who knows the assignment. Three stories tangle across space and time, bound by a wraparound about a psychic whose flesh becomes the page. The cast is notably multiethnic, with Freda Foh Shen, Yul Vazquez, Andy McQueen, Saad Siddiqui and Kenji Fitzgerald doing solid work. The film never remarks on this. Race is not a subject here, not a theme, not a glancing reference. These are simply working actors in a horror picture, which in 2020 reads as a choice, though not a statement.

The first segment follows Jenna, a college student whose sensory-processing condition makes certain noises unbearable. She stops taking her medication and runs. The film regards her condition with sympathy and then treats it as pathology, a thing to be escaped and later, in a closing twist of genuine cruelty, embraced. Two of the three segments orbit women, Jenna and the grieving Mary, but both are positioned as marks: manipulated, betrayed, paralyzed, mutilated. No argument is made on their behalf. The camera is interested in what can be done to a body, not in what a body means.

Money drifts through the proceedings, a bookseller's debt to shady lenders, Mary's need to raise funding for her work, and none of it coheres into a critique of anything larger. The body horror is thorough and committed, which places it at a distance from any contemporary conversation about accepting bodies as they are. And then there is the silence. No sermon. No moral. Braga has made a gory anthology that wants only to unsettle you, and it manages that without a single moment of instruction. In an era of cinema that cannot stop explaining itself, the restraint deserves a small, grudging nod.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Brannon Braga
Cast: Britt Robertson, Freda Foh Shen, Nicholas Campbell, Anna Friel, Rafi Gavron, Yul Vazquez, Andy McQueen, Kenji Fitzgerald
Genres: Horror, Science Fiction
Studios: Fuzzy Door Productions, Touchstone Television

Synopsis

A journey into uncharted and forbidden territory through three tales tangled in space and time.

Questions about Books of Blood

Is Books of Blood woke?

No — Books of Blood is not woke, scoring 12 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does Books of Blood have any woke elements?

1 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Neurodivergence (30). On Neurodivergence: Jenna is explicitly written with a sensory-processing condition that makes certain noises unbearable, and her arc involves medication noncompliance; the depiction is sympathetic but framed as horror pathology rather than advocacy.

How does Books of Blood compare to other 2020 movies?

It ranks #126 of the 227 films from 2020 we've scored; their average is 21. The wokest is One Night in Miami... (83).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings