WMS

Birth (2004)

Directed by Jonathan Glazer

No — Birth is not woke, scoring 3 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Jonathan Glazer followed Sexy Beast with something quieter and stranger: a reincarnation mystery set among wealthy Manhattanites in winter, in which a ten-year-old boy informs a grieving widow that he is her dead husband returned.

Consciousness Markers

👑
Feminist Agenda5

The film centers on a woman's grief and desire, but it is a psychological chamber drama about obsessive love, not a work advancing a feminist thesis.

🎭
Representation Casting0

The principal cast is entirely white (Kidman, Bright, Huston, Bacall, Heche, Stormare, Levine), with no diverse casting choices made or commented upon.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters or themes appear anywhere in the film.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

Race is entirely absent as a subject or theme in this New York-set reincarnation mystery.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate content whatsoever.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The film concerns wealthy Manhattanites and their private grief; it offers no economic critique.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes; the film's bathing scene controversy is about propriety, not body acceptance.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergence is depicted or referenced.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a contemporary fictional mystery with no historical subject matter to revise.

📢
Lecture Energy0

Glazer deliberately cultivates ambiguity and refuses to moralize or explain; the film is the opposite of a lecture.

Why it received this score

Jonathan Glazer followed Sexy Beast with something quieter and stranger: a reincarnation mystery set among wealthy Manhattanites in winter, in which a ten-year-old boy informs a grieving widow that he is her dead husband returned. The screenplay, worked over through twenty-one drafts with Milo Addica and Jean-Claude Carrière, refuses the ghost story it could have been. There are no explanations, no moral ledger, no closing argument. Glazer has said he does not believe in reincarnation and was chasing the idea of eternal love instead. The result is a chamber piece that drifts through engagement parties, opera houses, and Central Park like a rumor.

Nicole Kidman gives Anna a clipped, unglamorous grief, and the film's power rests almost entirely on her willingness to play small. The supporting cast (Bacall, Huston, Heche, Stormare) orbits her with appropriate unease. The notorious bath scene and the kiss on the lips generated a scandal at Venice, where the press screening was met with boos. Two decades on, the film has been reassessed as a masterpiece by some and remains ridiculous to others. Both camps are correct.

The film does offer a woman's interiority: her mourning, her desire, her willingness to abandon a decent fiancé for a child who may be a ghost or a thief. That is a feminine subject, and the film treats it with seriousness. It is not, however, a thesis. There is no program here, no instruction, no audience to be improved. Race, class, sexuality, the climate, the body politic: none of it appears, and none of it is missed. A wealthy widow's private anguish is simply the whole weather of the picture. We are left with a strange, sad, unfashionable object, and a quiet admiration for a director who declined to tell us what it meant.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Jonathan Glazer
Cast: Nicole Kidman, Cameron Bright, Danny Huston, Lauren Bacall, Alison Elliott, Arliss Howard, Michael Desautels, Anne Heche
Genres: Drama, Mystery
Studios: Academy Films, New Line Cinema, Lou Yi, March Entertainment, Fine Line Features

Synopsis

It took Anna 10 years to recover from the death of her husband, Sean, but now she's on the verge of marrying her boyfriend, Joseph, and finally moving on. However, on the night of her engagement party, a young boy named Sean turns up, saying he is her dead husband reincarnated. At first she ignores the child, but his knowledge of her former husband's life is uncanny, leading her to believe that he might be telling the truth.

Questions about Birth

Is Birth woke?

No — Birth is not woke, scoring 3 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does Birth have any woke elements?

Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Feminist Agenda at 5.

How does Birth compare to other 2004 movies?

It ranks #141 of the 178 films from 2004 we've scored; their average is 12. The wokest is Tropical Malady (62).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings