WMS

Red Lights (2012)

Directed by Rodrigo Cortés

No — Red Lights is not woke, scoring 0 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Rodrigo Cortes assembles a cast of unusual pedigree for a supernatural thriller: Sigourney Weaver as a university psychologist who debunks frauds, Cillian Murphy as her physicist assistant, Robert De Niro as the blind psychic returning after thirty years of self-imposed exile.

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting0

The cast is led by Sigourney Weaver and Cillian Murphy, but there is no deliberate modern representation-casting agenda or commentary.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or subtext are present.

👑
Feminist Agenda0

Sigourney Weaver plays a respected scientist, but the film does not advance a feminist agenda or critique patriarchy.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

No racial themes, commentary, or consciousness are present.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

The film has no climate or environmental messaging.

💰
Eat the Rich0

There is no eat-the-rich or anti-capitalist theme.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes or messaging are present.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

Psychic abilities and skepticism are central, but neurodivergence is not addressed or represented as a social theme.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a fictional supernatural thriller and does not revise historical narratives.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film debates skepticism versus paranormal belief, but it does not deliver modern social-justice lecture energy.

Why it received this score

Rodrigo Cortes assembles a cast of unusual pedigree for a supernatural thriller: Sigourney Weaver as a university psychologist who debunks frauds, Cillian Murphy as her physicist assistant, Robert De Niro as the blind psychic returning after thirty years of self-imposed exile. The first hour is patient and talky, a study of cold reading, planted earpieces, and the small theatrical tricks that sustain belief. Then the film loses its nerve and its footing, and the final act arrives with exploding electronics, a bathroom beating, and a twist that reframes everything we have watched.

The picture wants to argue about skepticism and faith, about whether science can account for the strange, but it never commits to a position. Cortes has said he intended only entertainment, and the film bears that out. There is no social argument here, no critique of power, no instruction for the audience on how to live. Weaver's character is a woman of authority, and the screenplay treats this as unremarkable, which it is. De Niro's psychic is a showman and a fraud, and the film judges him on those terms alone.

In the taxonomy of modern cultural markers, this one is barren. It is a genre exercise from 2012, made before the current era of explicit thematic messaging, and it carries none of that freight. There is no representation agenda, no queer subtext, no feminist critique, no racial consciousness, no environmental sermon, no class anger, no body-positive or neurodivergent advocacy, no revision of history, and no sermonizing. What it offers instead is atmosphere, a few good scenes, and a third act that squanders them. The classification is straightforward: zero across the board, a clean sheet, a film that wants to be a thriller and mostly fails at that. There is something almost restful about it.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Rodrigo Cortés
Genres: Thriller
Studios: Attitude Pinículas y Films A.I.E., Cindy Cowan Entertainment, First Generation Films, Nostromo Pictures, La Sexta, Canal+ España, Millennium Media, TV3, Atresmedia Cine

Synopsis

Two investigators of paranormal hoaxes, the veteran Dr. Margaret Matheson and her young assistant, Tom Buckley, study the most varied metaphysical phenomena with the aim of proving their fraudulent origins. Simon Silver, a legendary blind psychic, reappears after an enigmatic absence of 30 years to become the greatest international challenge to both orthodox science and professional sceptics. Tom starts to develop an intense obsession with Silver, whose magnetism becomes stronger with each new manifestation of inexplicable events. As Tom gets closer to Silver, tension mounts, and his worldview is threatened to its core.

Questions about Red Lights

Is Red Lights woke?

No — Red Lights is not woke, scoring 0 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does Red Lights have any woke elements?

No. All 10 markers score zero.

How does Red Lights compare to other 2012 movies?

It ranks #193 of the 230 films from 2012 we've scored; their average is 12. The wokest is Killing Them Softly (92).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings