
Pet (2016)
Directed by Carles Torrens
No — Pet is not woke, scoring 5 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.
Pet presents a deeply unsettling examination of desire and the fragile architecture of power dynamics.
Consciousness Markers
The film features a female antagonist who reverses the captive narrative and engages in gender-power mind games, but it does not advance a coherent feminist agenda.
The cast is predominantly white with a few minority actors in functional supporting roles; there is no deliberate or commented-upon representation casting.
No LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext are present.
No racial themes, commentary, or consciousness are present.
No environmental or climate-related themes appear.
No critique of capitalism, wealth, or class structures is present.
No body-positive themes or messaging are present.
Seth is portrayed as introverted and obsessive, but the film does not frame this as neurodivergent representation or advocacy.
No historical revisionism or reimagining of real events is present.
The film is a psychological thriller and does not contain didactic or lecturing energy.
Why it received this score
Pet presents a deeply unsettling examination of desire and the fragile architecture of power dynamics. This 2016 exercise in dark cinema utilizes a familiar premise of obsession, only to dismantle it through a shocking shift in agency. The female lead, Holly, functions not as a victim but as a catalyst for profound psychological warfare. Her actions challenge traditional narrative expectations of the captive, engaging in a complex, gendered power struggle that is undeniably central to the film’s cultural weight.
We find a film that is not concerned with traditional progressive sensibilities like racial equity or climate activism. Instead, its focus is internal, leaning heavily into the dynamics of control. The shift in the narrative allows the character to subvert the typical misogynistic tropes, using the guise of romantic obsession to enact her own brutal terms. This creates a volatile space for exploring the messy intersections of control and desire, a far more uncomfortable territory than standard social commentary.
It is a grim piece of work. The entire endeavor operates within the confines of a bleak psychological landscape. The film offers little comfort, relying instead on its startling reversals and its commitment to depicting a descent into absolute moral ambiguity. It is a heavy, bleak experience, but it certainly demands we consider the way power can be reclaimed, even in the most destructive circumstances.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Synopsis
A man bumps into an old crush and becomes obsessed. After several failed attempts at winning her over, he kidnaps her and holds her captive underneath the animal shelter where he works.
Questions about Pet
Is Pet woke?
No — Pet is not woke, scoring 5 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.
Does Pet have any woke elements?
Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Feminist Agenda at 10.
How does Pet compare to other 2016 movies?
It ranks #221 of the 285 films from 2016 we've scored; their average is 16. The wokest is 13th (92).
How is the Woke Score calculated?
An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.