WMS

Our Kind of Traitor (2016)

Directed by Susanna White

No — Our Kind of Traitor is not woke, scoring 13 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Susanna White's adaptation of John le Carré's 2010 novel arrives with the quiet competence of a well-tailored suit and the same reluctance to make a scene.

Consciousness Markers

💰
Eat the Rich35

The plot centers on money laundering, corrupt bankers, and an unholy alliance between finance and intelligence, offering a cynical critique of oligarchic wealth, though it targets individual corruption rather than capitalism itself.

🎭
Representation Casting22

Naomie Harris and Khalid Abdalla appear in prominent roles, but their casting is unremarkable and carries no representational commentary; the film simply casts competent actors.

👑
Feminist Agenda15

Directed by Susanna White and featuring a capable attorney girlfriend who retrieves Dima's family, but the film makes no feminist argument and Gail's competence is standard thriller competence.

📢
Lecture Energy8

A conventional spy thriller that shows rather than tells; it offers no moralizing monologues or didactic messaging.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext appear anywhere in the plot.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

The story involves Russian oligarchs, MI6, and corrupt British officials with no engagement with race as a theme.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate content whatsoever.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positive themes or messaging present.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

Dima's eidetic memory is a plot device for memorizing account numbers, not a depiction of neurodivergence in any modern sense.

📖
Revisionist History0

A contemporary le Carré adaptation with no historical revisionism.

Why it received this score

Susanna White's adaptation of John le Carré's 2010 novel arrives with the quiet competence of a well-tailored suit and the same reluctance to make a scene. A young Oxford academic and his attorney girlfriend, holidaying in Morocco, stumble into the orbit of a Russian oligarch who wants a tennis partner and, eventually, a courier. The machinery that follows is familiar: MI6, a corrupt minister, a bank that exists to launder the proceeds of other people's misery. White directs with restraint. The film prefers a raised eyebrow to a raised voice, which is its own kind of virtue in a genre that often mistakes volume for stakes.

The political register here is cynical but narrow. Money laundering, purchased politicians, and an unholy alliance between the City and the intelligence services all receive a cold stare, and there is a genuine sourness in the film's view of oligarchic wealth. It aims its contempt at individuals, however, not at the system that produces them. Naomie Harris's Gail proves resourceful when the plot requires a family to be retrieved from a French apartment, and she handles the assignment with the brisk efficiency of someone who has read the script. Her competence is the competence of the genre. It carries no argument about anything larger.

Where the film is most striking is in what it declines to notice. Dima's eidetic memory is a mechanism for storing account numbers, nothing more. The story moves through Morocco, London, Paris, and the Alps without a single glance at the world those places contain beyond their function as backdrops. Race never enters the frame as a subject, the climate never enters it at all, and the bodies on screen are bodies only insofar as they can be shot at or mourned. It is a film that shows instead of lecturing, and in an era of cinema that increasingly treats the audience as a classroom, that restraint deserves a modest nod of respect.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Susanna White
Genres: Thriller
Studios: StudioCanal, Anton Capital Entertainment, The Ink Factory, Film4 Productions, Potboiler Productions

Synopsis

A young Oxford academic and his attorney girlfriend holiday in Morocco. They bump into a Russian millionaire who owns a peninsula and a diamond watch. He wants a game of tennis. What else he wants propels the lovers on a tortuous journey to the City of London and its unholy alliance with Britain's intelligence establishment, to Paris and the Alps.

Questions about Our Kind of Traitor

Is Our Kind of Traitor woke?

No — Our Kind of Traitor is not woke, scoring 13 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does Our Kind of Traitor have any woke elements?

1 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Eat the Rich (35). On Eat the Rich: The plot centers on money laundering, corrupt bankers, and an unholy alliance between finance and intelligence, offering a cynical critique of oligarchic wealth, though it targets individual corruption rather than capitalism itself.

How does Our Kind of Traitor compare to other 2016 movies?

It ranks #128 of the 285 films from 2016 we've scored; their average is 16. The wokest is 13th (92).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings