WMS

Money Monster (2016)

Directed by Jodie Foster

No — Money Monster is not especially woke, scoring 34 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Jodie Foster directs this 2016 hostage thriller with a steady hand and a clear thesis: the men who move money are not to be trusted.

Consciousness Markers

💰
Eat the Rich72

The entire plot is a screed against Wall Street greed: a CEO swindles investors, a working-class man loses his life savings, and the film explicitly sides with the victim against financial elites.

📢
Lecture Energy35

The film carries a clear socioeconomic message about financial corruption and delivers it through dramatic confrontation, though it remains a thriller rather than a sermon.

🎭
Representation Casting28

The cast is overwhelmingly white, with Giancarlo Esposito as the most prominent minority performer and a brief Korean programmer character in Seoul; diversity is incidental rather than a stated aim.

👑
Feminist Agenda28

Jodie Foster directs and Julia Roberts and Caitriona Balfe play competent women in positions of authority, but the film never frames its conflict in gendered terms or advances a feminist thesis.

✊
Racial Consciousness15

The South African platinum-mine subplot gestures at exploitation of Black laborers by a white CEO, but it is framed as corporate malfeasance rather than a racial critique.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext appear anywhere in the film.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate themes are present.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes or messaging.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergent characters or themes.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a fictional thriller, not a reworking of historical events.

Why it received this score

Jodie Foster directs this 2016 hostage thriller with a steady hand and a clear thesis: the men who move money are not to be trusted. George Clooney plays Lee Gates, a television financial personality whose on-air endorsement of a corporation costs a working-class viewer his entire savings. When that viewer arrives at the studio with a gun and a vest of clay, the film settles into a two-hour argument about who deserves our sympathy. The answer arrives early and never wavers. Wall Street is a casino, the house always wins, and the little man gets the bill. This is a film that knows its enemy and names him.

The socioeconomic anger is the engine here, and it runs hot. Kyle Budwell loses sixty thousand dollars to a rigged trade, then loses his dignity when his pregnant girlfriend berates him on live television, and the film treats his rage as righteous. The villain, a chief executive played by Dominic West, is brought down by Icelandic hackers, a South African platinum mine, and a passport discrepancy. The plotting is elaborate, the moral is simple, and the final punch Clooney throws lands with the weight of a closing argument. Reviewers at the time compared it unfavorably to The Big Short and Network, which is fair. Those films had a scalpel. This one has a sledgehammer, and it swings.

On matters of identity the film is largely incurious. Foster sits in the director's chair and Julia Roberts and Caitriona Balfe occupy competent positions of authority, but the conflict is never framed as gendered. Giancarlo Esposito appears as a police captain, a Korean programmer briefs the team from Seoul, and the South African mine workers exist as a plot device about corporate corruption instead of a racial one. The cast is white, the message is economic, and the film has no interest in anything else. It wants us angry about money. It succeeds, modestly, and then it ends.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Jodie Foster
Cast: George Clooney, Julia Roberts, Jack O'Connell, Dominic West, Caitríona Balfe, Giancarlo Esposito, Christopher Denham, Lenny Venito
Genres: Thriller, Drama
Studios: TriStar Pictures, LStar Capital, Smokehouse Pictures, The Allegiance Theater

Synopsis

Financial TV host Lee Gates and his producer Patty are put in an extreme situation when an irate investor takes over their studio.

Questions about Money Monster

Is Money Monster woke?

No — Money Monster is not especially woke, scoring 34 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Based.

Does Money Monster have any woke elements?

2 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Eat the Rich (72) and Lecture Energy (35). On Eat the Rich: The entire plot is a screed against Wall Street greed: a CEO swindles investors, a working-class man loses his life savings, and the film explicitly sides with the victim against financial elites.

How does Money Monster compare to other 2016 movies?

It ranks #32 of the 285 films from 2016 we've scored; their average is 16. The wokest is 13th (92).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings