
Lucky Number Slevin (2006)
Directed by Paul McGuigan
No — Lucky Number Slevin is not woke, scoring 10 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.
Lucky Number Slevin arrives from 2006, a year when a crime picture could still assemble Morgan Freeman, Ben Kingsley, Lucy Liu, Bruce Willis, and Stanley Tucci in one room and ask them to do nothing but menace and quip.
Consciousness Markers
The cast is notably multi-ethnic for 2006, with Morgan Freeman, Lucy Liu, Ben Kingsley, and Mykelti Williamson in prominent roles, but their ethnicity is incidental and never foregrounded as a statement.
Lucy Liu's Lindsey is a capable coroner-turned-investigator with some agency, but she mostly serves as a love interest and gets shot to protect a secret.
The Rabbi's son Yitzchok is gay, but he exists chiefly as a target nicknamed 'The Fairy,' framed with a pejorative slur, and murdered to advance the plot. This is presence, not advocacy.
Minority actors play crime bosses and detectives, but race is never a thematic concern; the film is indifferent to racial consciousness.
A twisty genre exercise that never pauses to deliver a moral or social lesson to the audience.
No environmental themes whatsoever.
A gangster revenge noir with no economic critique; wealth is simply the backdrop of criminal power.
No engagement with body image or body positivity.
No depiction or discussion of neurodivergence.
Set in a stylized present-day New York with no historical revisionism.
Why it received this score
Lucky Number Slevin arrives from 2006, a year when a crime picture could still assemble Morgan Freeman, Ben Kingsley, Lucy Liu, Bruce Willis, and Stanley Tucci in one room and ask them to do nothing but menace and quip. Paul McGuigan directs Jason Smilovic's script with the confidence of a man who has watched Pulp Fiction many times and intends to let us know it. The plot is a Kansas City Shuffle, a double bluff wrapped in a horse-racing debt, and it unfolds with the grim satisfaction of a puzzle assembled by someone who has misplaced a few pieces on purpose. It is competent. It is also entirely content to be a genre exercise.
The film's cultural furniture belongs to its era and travels no further. Its crime bosses and detectives happen to be played by a notably mixed group of actors, though the screenplay never asks us to think about that fact even once. The Rabbi's son, Yitzchok, is gay, and the movie announces this by having everyone call him The Fairy, a pejorative deployed with the subtlety of a brick, before he is dispatched to move the plot along. Lucy Liu's Lindsey is a coroner with a sharp tongue and a camera, useful for roughly twenty minutes before she is shot to protect a secret and later resurrected by a man's affection. She is a device with good posture.
Beyond that, the film has nothing to say and no interest in saying it. There is no economic critique beneath the gangsters, no environmental conscience, no meditation on the body, no acknowledgment of neurodivergence, no revision of any history. It does not lecture. It simply wants to be clever, and it mostly is, in the way a magic trick is clever right up until we see the hand.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Synopsis
Slevin is mistakenly put in the middle of a personal war between the city’s biggest criminal bosses. Under constant watch, Slevin must try not to get killed by an infamous assassin and come up with an idea of how to get out of his current dilemma.
Questions about Lucky Number Slevin
Is Lucky Number Slevin woke?
No — Lucky Number Slevin is not woke, scoring 10 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.
Does Lucky Number Slevin have any woke elements?
1 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by Representation Casting (30). On Representation Casting: The cast is notably multi-ethnic for 2006, with Morgan Freeman, Lucy Liu, Ben Kingsley, and Mykelti Williamson in prominent roles, but their ethnicity is incidental and never foregrounded as a statement.
How does Lucky Number Slevin compare to other 2006 movies?
It ranks #72 of the 211 films from 2006 we've scored; their average is 11. The wokest is An Inconvenient Truth (92).
How is the Woke Score calculated?
An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.