WMS

Johnny English Strikes Again (2018)

Directed by David Kerr

No — Johnny English Strikes Again is not woke, scoring 8 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Johnny English Strikes Again arrives as the third installment in a series that treats espionage as a delivery system for slapstick.

Consciousness Markers

💰
Eat the Rich20

Jason Volta is a Silicon Valley billionaire villain threatening to control the internet and extort world leaders, giving the film a mild tech-oligarch critique, though it remains a Bond-style villain plot rather than systemic anti-capitalism.

🎭
Representation Casting12

The supporting cast includes women in authority and a few minority actors in minor roles, but diversity is incidental rather than a stated feature.

👑
Feminist Agenda10

Women appear as a Prime Minister, a Russian spy, and a submarine captain, but the film does not advance a feminist argument or critique patriarchy.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters, relationships, or themes appear; the comedy relies on conventional heteronormative setups.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

The film has no racial themes, commentary, or storylines; minority cast members are not used to explore race.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate crisis content appears in the plot or satire.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positive themes or body-image commentary; physical humor is based on slapstick accidents rather than body acceptance.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

Johnny English is clumsy and old-fashioned, but the film does not frame him as neurodivergent or explore neurodiversity.

📖
Revisionist History0

The plot is a fictional spy comedy with no historical revisionism or reinterpretation of real events.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film gestures at analogue-versus-digital generational contrast, but it delivers this through slapstick rather than preachy lecturing.

Why it received this score

Johnny English Strikes Again arrives as the third installment in a series that treats espionage as a delivery system for slapstick. Rowan Atkinson's agent is an analogue relic, and the plot pits him against Jason Volta, a Silicon Valley billionaire with a plan to extort world leaders by threatening the internet. That is a mild anti-oligarch joke, though the target remains a Bond villain in a hoodie. The film is not mounting a systemic critique of capital. It is content to let the billionaire monologue about data while English fumbles with a tablet.

The supporting cast includes Emma Thompson as Prime Minister, Olga Kurylenko as a Russian operative, and Vicki Pepperdine as a Navy captain. Their authority is incidental, not a thesis. A few minority performers appear in minor roles, and the screenplay neither notices nor comments. The film does not reach for the era's social themes. It has no racial argument, no queer material, no climate sermon, no body-image discourse, and no neurodiversity framing. Johnny's clumsiness is slapstick, not a condition. The historical imagination stops at castles and armour, with no revisionist intent.

There is no lecture energy here. The analogue-versus-digital contrast is delivered through a VR mishap, a phone mix-up, and a thrown tablet, not through sermonizing. This is a sequel that knows its constituency and serves it with competent indifference. It is not culturally alert, and it is not trying to be. That may be a relief or a limitation, depending on appetite for sherbet fountain espionage. The film ends with explosive jelly babies and a man in armour, which is as close as it comes to a statement.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score

Synopsis

Disaster strikes when a criminal mastermind reveals the identities of all active undercover agents in Britain. The secret service can now rely on only one man - Johnny English. Currently teaching at a minor prep school, Johnny springs back into action to find the mysterious hacker. For this mission to succeed, he’ll need all of his skills - what few he has - as the man with yesterday’s analogue methods faces off against tomorrow’s digital technology.

Questions about Johnny English Strikes Again

Is Johnny English Strikes Again woke?

No — Johnny English Strikes Again is not woke, scoring 8 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does Johnny English Strikes Again have any woke elements?

Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Eat the Rich at 20.

How does Johnny English Strikes Again compare to other 2018 movies?

It ranks #217 of the 325 films from 2018 we've scored; their average is 20. The wokest is Return (92).

Is Johnny English Strikes Again the most woke Johnny English movie?

Yes. It scores highest of the 3 Johnny English films we've scored.

Related rankings