WMS

Hot Tub Time Machine 2 (2015)

Directed by Steve Pink

No — Hot Tub Time Machine 2 is not woke, scoring 4 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Hot Tub Time Machine 2 arrives five years after its predecessor, which is roughly the interval required for a studio to forget why anyone liked the first one.

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting12

The ensemble includes Black leads (Craig Robinson, Rob Corddry's foil) and Kumail Nanjiani in support, but their presence is never framed as a statement — it's just a studio comedy cast doing bits.

💰
Eat the Rich5

Lou is a billionaire who got rich off ill-gotten gains and runs a Google-parody called 'Lougle,' but the film treats his wealth as aspirational rather than as a target of critique.

📢
Lecture Energy3

This is a juvenile gag comedy with no didactic ambitions; the closest thing to a message is a closing 'make America happen' gag that is parody, not sermon.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

GLAAD specifically condemned the film for 'outright offensive depictions of LGBT people' and defamatory homophobic humor; the VR sex gag is played for gay-panic laughs, the precise inverse of LGBTQ+ advocacy.

👑
Feminist Agenda0

Variety called it 'misogynistic'; women exist as props, conquests, and punchlines, with Jill's arc reduced to infidelity and a wedding plot device.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

A Black co-lead and a South Asian supporting player appear without any engagement with race, racism, or racial themes whatsoever.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental content of any kind; the future is rendered as a playground of gadgets and game shows.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-diversity themes; physical comedy here is aimed at humiliation, not acceptance.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergent characters or themes are present or acknowledged.

📖
Revisionist History0

Time travel is used purely for farce and self-correction of personal embarrassments, not to reframe historical narratives.

Why it received this score

Hot Tub Time Machine 2 arrives five years after its predecessor, which is roughly the interval required for a studio to forget why anyone liked the first one. Steve Pink returns to direct. John Cusack does not return, except in an unrated cut that exists to be sold separately. The plot sends Lou, Nick, and Jacob ten years forward to solve a shooting, and the film spends its running time on game shows, hallucinogens, and a suicide attempt played for uplift. It grossed thirteen million dollars against a budget of fourteen to eighteen. The Golden Raspberry voters noticed. So did everyone else.

The cast includes Craig Robinson and Kumail Nanjiani, and the film asks them to do nothing with that fact. Their presence is a payroll decision, not a statement. The virtual reality sequence at the center of the Choozy Doozy game show exists so that a man can be humiliated by the prospect of sex with another man, and the joke lands exactly where the filmmakers aimed it. GLAAD called the film out for offensive depictions. Variety reached for the words homophobic and misogynistic in the same sentence, which is efficient. Women here are wives, conquests, or plot devices who sleep with the wrong man to move the third act along.

There is a billionaire in the film, and he runs a company called Lougle, and he acquired his fortune through theft. The screenplay regards this as a triumph. Wealth is the reward for being loud. No environmental thought intrudes on the futuristic setting, which is rendered as a vending machine of gadgets. The closing gag puts a man in a minuteman costume and invites the audience to make America happen, and the line is a punchline, not a platform. This is a film with no sermon to deliver, no consciousness to raise, and no interest in anything beyond the next bodily function. On the scale that concerns us, it registers as a near-total absence.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score

Part of

Director: Steve Pink
Genres: Comedy
Franchise: Hot Tub Time Machine Collection

Synopsis

After their first adventure with the Hot Tub Time Machine, Lou and Nick are living very well off their ill-gotten gains, while Jacob still cannot rely on Lou to be a positive role model. When an unknown assailant breaks into Lou's mansion and shoots him, Nick and Jacob take him for another trip in the hot tub. They emerge in the year 2025, where they must figure out who shot Lou and prevent it from happening again.

Questions about Hot Tub Time Machine 2

Is Hot Tub Time Machine 2 woke?

No — Hot Tub Time Machine 2 is not woke, scoring 4 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does Hot Tub Time Machine 2 have any woke elements?

Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Representation Casting at 12.

How does Hot Tub Time Machine 2 compare to other 2015 movies?

It ranks #226 of the 289 films from 2015 we've scored; their average is 15. The wokest is Chi-Raq (78).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings