WMS

Kinds of Kindness (2024)

Directed by Yorgos Lanthimos

No — Kinds of Kindness is not especially woke, scoring 22 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Yorgos Lanthimos returns to the sour, deadpan register of his early Greek work, reuniting with co-writer Efthimis Filippou for a triptych of fables in which the same actors cycle through fresh miseries in each segment.

Consciousness Markers

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes45

The first story centers on Robert's relationship with his domineering boss and lover Raymond, an explicit same-sex dynamic, and the third story revolves around a sex cult; queerness is present but treated as texture rather than thesis.

🎭
Representation Casting30

The ensemble is notably diverse (Hong Chau, Mamoudou Athie, Hunter Schafer), but the casting carries no identity-based commentary or messaging; each actor simply plays multiple roles in the triptych.

💰
Eat the Rich25

The first story's premise of a boss who controls his employee's house, car, and sex life can be read as a metaphor for totalizing workplace/economic domination, though it is framed as absurdist power dynamics rather than explicit class critique.

👑
Feminist Agenda10

Despite prominent female leads, the film depicts graphic violence against women, victim-blaming, and coerced self-mutilation with no feminist framing or critique.

📢
Lecture Energy10

Lanthimos is misanthropic and deadpan rather than didactic; the film offers no moral instruction or social sermon, only caustic absurdism.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

The film contains no racial themes, commentary, or consciousness whatsoever; the diverse cast exists without any engagement with race.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental or climate content appears anywhere in the triptych.

💗
Body Positivity0

The film features body horror and self-mutilation rather than any body-positive messaging or diverse body representation.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

A character is prescribed antipsychotics amid paranoid delusions, but mental illness is depicted as grotesque and absurd rather than as neurodivergent representation or advocacy.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a contemporary absurdist fable with no historical subject matter to revise.

Why it received this score

Yorgos Lanthimos returns to the sour, deadpan register of his early Greek work, reuniting with co-writer Efthimis Filippou for a triptych of fables in which the same actors cycle through fresh miseries in each segment. Jesse Plemons anchors all three, Emma Stone and Willem Dafoe drift through as variations on control and submission, and a genuinely international ensemble (Hong Chau, Mamoudou Athie, Hunter Schafer) occupies the margins. That diversity is simply there, unremarked and unexamined. The film has no interest in what it might mean. It is interested in what people will do when someone else holds the leash.

The first story gives us Robert, whose boss and lover Raymond owns his house, his car, and his bedroom schedule; the same-sex dynamic is explicit and entirely unremarkable to the film, which treats it as one more lever of domination. The third story orbits a sex cult and its rituals of sweat and navel-licking. Queerness here is texture, not argument. Meanwhile the film inflicts graphic cruelty on its women (severed thumbs, carved livers, a drugging and a rape) with no framing that could be called a critique, and a character's antipsychotic prescription is played for grotesque comedy instead of advocacy. There is no climate anxiety, no racial consciousness, no historical revision. The body count is the point, not the bodies.

A possible reading of Raymond as capital itself exists, a boss who provisions your life and then charges you for it. The film gestures at that idea and then shrugs. It is not a sermon. Lanthimos has no interest in instructing anyone, and the absence of moral instruction is both the picture's integrity and the reason it leaves so little behind. A less confident director would have told us what to feel. This one simply shows us the dogs, and lets us sort it out.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score

Part of

Director: Yorgos Lanthimos
Cast: Emma Stone, Jesse Plemons, Willem Dafoe, Margaret Qualley, Hong Chau, Mamoudou Athie, Joe Alwyn, Hunter Schafer
Genres: Comedy, Drama

Synopsis

A triptych fable following a man without choice who tries to take control of his own life; a policeman who is alarmed that his wife who was missing-at-sea has returned and seems a different person; and a woman determined to find a specific someone with a special ability, who is destined to become a prodigious spiritual leader.

Questions about Kinds of Kindness

Is Kinds of Kindness woke?

No — Kinds of Kindness is not especially woke, scoring 22 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Based.

Does Kinds of Kindness have any woke elements?

2 of the 10 markers register at 30 or above, led by LGBTQ+ Themes (45) and Representation Casting (30). On LGBTQ+ Themes: The first story centers on Robert's relationship with his domineering boss and lover Raymond, an explicit same-sex dynamic, and the third story revolves around a sex cult; queerness is present but treated as texture rather than thesis.

How does Kinds of Kindness compare to other 2024 movies?

It ranks #66 of the 189 films from 2024 we've scored; their average is 22. The wokest is The Six Triple Eight (92).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings