WMS

In Your Eyes (2014)

Directed by Brin Hill

No — In Your Eyes is not woke, scoring 12 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

This film attempts to explore deep, cosmic connection, yet it settles for a narrative structure that is entirely too predictable.

Consciousness Markers

👑
Feminist Agenda25

Rebecca is the central protagonist and the film mildly critiques her controlling husband, but the narrative remains a conventional romance in which she is ultimately rescued by the male lead.

🎭
Representation Casting20

The film features a female lead and one Black supporting actor, but the cast is otherwise largely white and the diversity does not appear to be a deliberate thematic focus.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

There are no LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext in the film.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

The film does not engage with race, racial identity, or racial justice themes.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

There is no environmental or climate-related content.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The film does not critique capitalism, wealth inequality, or class structures in any substantive way.

💗
Body Positivity0

There is no body positivity theme or commentary on body image.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

The telepathic bond is treated as a supernatural phenomenon, not as neurodivergence or mental health representation.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is a contemporary fictional romance and does not revise or reinterpret historical events.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film is a sentimental romance and does not contain preachy or lecture-like messaging.

Why it received this score

This film attempts to explore deep, cosmic connection, yet it settles for a narrative structure that is entirely too predictable. We are presented with two souls who share a telepathic link, a premise that is inherently intriguing. However, the execution remains tethered to the sentimental conventions of a mid-2010s romance. The female lead navigates a relationship with a controlling spouse, which provides a mild, conventional critique of domestic imbalance. But the narrative concludes with a familiar rescue arc, ultimately prioritizing the emotional payoff of the pairing over any substantive critique of the social structures surrounding the characters. The supporting cast is largely homogenous, ensuring the story remains comfortably within familiar demographics without any challenging exploration of diverse lived experiences.

There is a complete absence of the kinds of progressive social commentary that currently define modern cinematic discourse. The film makes no attempt to address issues of class, systemic inequality, or the complexities of modern identity. Any perceived social consciousness is merely a pleasant background hum, not a driving force of the plot. The supernatural elements, specifically the telepathy, function purely as a plot device to facilitate romance, never evolving into a meaningful commentary on neurodivergence or mental health. This is a story about finding love across a distance, a rather simple premise that doesn't require the kind of heavy-handed social engineering that dominates much contemporary popular culture. It is a meticulously crafted, if somewhat self-indulgent, piece of escapism.

What we get is a polished, if uninspired, look at two people who are in love. The film is a predictable journey from New Mexico to New Hampshire, a sentimental fantasy that does not attempt to expand the boundaries of its own world. It is a technically competent piece of genre fare that refuses to engage with the complexities of our current cultural anxieties. It exists purely as a love story, a quiet exercise in feeling that never requires the heavy lifting of cultural awareness.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score
Director: Brin Hill
Cast: Zoe Kazan, Michael Stahl-David, Mark Feuerstein, Steve Howey, David Gallagher, Steve Harris, Nikki Reed, Reed Birney
Genres: Drama, Romance, Science Fiction
Studios: Night & Day Pictures, Bellwether Pictures

Synopsis

Two seemingly unconnected souls from different corners of the United States make a telepathic bond that allows them to see, hear, and feel the other's experiences, creating a connection that cannot be broken.

Questions about In Your Eyes

Is In Your Eyes woke?

No — In Your Eyes is not woke, scoring 12 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does In Your Eyes have any woke elements?

Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Feminist Agenda at 25.

How does In Your Eyes compare to other 2014 movies?

It ranks #113 of the 303 films from 2014 we've scored; their average is 13. The wokest is Selma (68).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings