WMS

Flubber (1997)

Directed by Les Mayfield

No — Flubber is not woke, scoring 3 out of 100 on our wokeness meter.

Flubber arrives in 1997, a remake of a 1961 Disney comedy, and carries the cultural baggage of neither era in any meaningful sense.

Consciousness Markers

👑
Feminist Agenda5

Sara Jean serves as college president, a mild note of female authority, but the film is a conventional romance-driven comedy with no feminist agenda.

💰
Eat the Rich5

The antagonists are a wealthy sponsor and an idea-stealing corporate rival, a faint rich-villain trope, but the film ends by partnering with the Ford Motor Company, hardly an eat-the-rich stance.

🎭
Representation Casting0

The cast is overwhelmingly white, led by Robin Williams and Marcia Gay Harden, with no deliberate diverse or inclusive casting choices.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

There are no LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext anywhere in the film.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

The film engages no racial themes or commentary whatsoever.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

Flubber is framed as a new energy source to save a college's finances, but this is a plot device, not an environmental or climate crusade.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body-positivity themes or messaging are present.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

The 'absent-minded professor' is a classic slapstick trope, not a depiction or advocacy of neurodivergence.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film makes no historical claims and revises no historical record.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film is pure slapstick family entertainment and never pauses to deliver a social or moral lecture.

Why it received this score

Flubber arrives in 1997, a remake of a 1961 Disney comedy, and carries the cultural baggage of neither era in any meaningful sense. Robin Williams plays an absent-minded professor who invents a sentient green rubber that makes objects fly, misses his own wedding three times, and saves a small college from insolvency. The film's concerns are kinetic: bouncing, slapping, and the reliable comedy of a substance that refuses to sit still. On the matter of social consciousness, it is a vacuum. Not a hostile vacuum. Simply the ambient indifference of a family comedy built before such questions were routinely asked of family comedies.

Two faint flickers deserve mention. Marcia Gay Harden's Sara Jean serves as college president, a small note of institutional female authority that the screenplay never examines. The villains are a wealthy sponsor and an idea-stealing corporate rival, which gestures toward a rich-villain tradition, though the film resolves its financial crisis by cutting a deal with the Ford Motor Company, a conclusion that would embarrass any serious reading of class politics. Weebo, the robot assistant who loves the professor and sacrifices herself for his happiness, is the film's most emotionally intricate creation, and even that thread is played for pathos, not politics.

All that remains is pure slapstick. No sermons, no moral instruction, no attempt to educate the audience on the correct arrangement of the world. The film was panned on release and the criticism was accurate: the effects overwhelm the star, the script thins out, and the whole enterprise feels like a machine running on fumes. But its failures are failures of craft, not of ideology. In a landscape of relentless instruction, there is something almost restful about a movie that simply wants to show us a flying car and call it a day.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Share this score

Part of

Director: Les Mayfield
Genres: Comedy, Family, Science Fiction
Studios: Walt Disney Pictures, Great Oaks Entertainment

Synopsis

Professor Phillip Brainard, an absent minded professor, works with his assistant Weebo, trying to create a substance that's a new source of energy and that will save Medfield College where his sweetheart Sara is the president. He has missed his wedding twice, and on the afternoon of his third wedding, Professor Brainard creates flubber, which allows objects to fly through the air.

Questions about Flubber

Is Flubber woke?

No — Flubber is not woke, scoring 3 out of 100 on our wokeness meter. That earns it a verdict of Ultra Based.

Does Flubber have any woke elements?

Very few. None of the 10 markers reaches 30, the level where a marker counts as present; the highest is Eat the Rich at 5.

How does Flubber compare to other 1997 movies?

It ranks #90 of the 109 films from 1997 we've scored; their average is 12. The wokest is Happy Together (65).

How is the Woke Score calculated?

An AI-assisted process researches the film and its reception, scores it 0–100 on ten markers, then combines those into one 0–100 Woke Score. It measures a specific set of 2020s cultural themes, not film quality.

Related rankings