
Wonder Woman 1984
2020 · Directed by Patty Jenkins
Woke Score
CriticCritic Score
Audience
Based
Critics rated this 25 points above its woke score. Among Based films, this critic score ranks #240 of 346.
Representation Casting
Score: 58/100
Female director, female protagonist, and supporting cast includes diverse actors (Amr Waked, Natasha Rothwell), though the film's commitment to substantive representation appears limited by its generic obligations.
LGBTQ+ Themes
Score: 0/100
No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation evident in the film's plot or cast.
Feminist Agenda
Score: 48/100
Female-centered narrative with a female protagonist and director, but the film treats potential feminist themes about female rivalry and desire with surface-level treatment rather than substantive interrogation.
Racial Consciousness
Score: 15/100
While the cast includes actors of various backgrounds, the film demonstrates minimal engagement with racial themes or consciousness in its narrative or character development.
Climate Crusade
Score: 0/100
No climate change or environmental themes present in the film.
Eat the Rich
Score: 25/100
Maxwell Lord's character represents greed and capitalist ambition, but the film's critique of wealth and exploitation remains abstract and lacks force or systematic interrogation.
Body Positivity
Score: 0/100
No body positivity themes or commentary evident in the film.
Neurodivergence
Score: 0/100
No representation of neurodivergence or relevant thematic engagement.
Revisionist History
Score: 0/100
The 1980s setting is used primarily for aesthetic and narrative purposes without engaging in revisionist historical commentary.
Lecture Energy
Score: 20/100
The film contains occasional moments where it pauses to address themes of ambition and desire, but these moments lack the preachy insistence typical of high lecture energy.
Synopsis
A botched store robbery places Wonder Woman in a global battle against a powerful and mysterious ancient force that puts her powers in jeopardy.
Consciousness Assessment
Wonder Woman 1984 arrives as a curious artifact of 2020 progressive cinema, a film that wears its female-fronted credentials with the comfortable confidence of a superhero who knows she has already won the box office argument. Director Patty Jenkins has constructed a vehicle for Gal Gadot that traffics in the surface language of contemporary cultural consciousness without committing particularly to its deeper demands. The film presents a female protagonist who is powerful, intelligent, and the undisputed center of the narrative, yet this foundational choice does not necessarily translate into the kind of systematic social awareness that defines modern progressive filmmaking.
The narrative itself occupies a curious space. Barbara Minerva's transformation into Cheetah carries faint echoes of feminist commentary about female rivalry and the corruption of competitive desire, but the film treats these themes with the same glancing touch it applies to its villains. Maxwell Lord, played by Pedro Pascal, functions primarily as a vehicle for abstract commentary about greed and masculine ambition rather than as a character whose villainy is rooted in systemic exploitation. The script gestures toward 1980s excess and capitalist hunger without marshaling any particular critique with force or clarity. We watch a superhero film that contains women, features a female director, and nominally concerns itself with power and desire, but rarely does it push beyond the generic requirements of the form to interrogate these elements with any real conviction.
The supporting cast offers modest diversity in its composition, though the film's commitment to substantive representation appears limited by its primary allegiance to spectacle and plot mechanics. The overall effect is of a film that has learned the aesthetic vocabulary of progressive casting while remaining somewhat indifferent to the deeper questions about narrative representation and thematic purpose that typically accompany such choices. It is competent, it is entertaining, and it is thoroughly committed to its own lack of ambition regarding anything beyond the immediate gratifications of the superhero genre.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Critic Reviews
“To be sure, we get a classic comic book movie storyline about a megalomaniacal madman intent on taking over the world, but there’s often a relatively light tone to the proceedings. This is a throwback piece of pure pop entertainment.”
“Wonder Woman 1984 is a bright and hopeful adventure that pays loving homage to the superhero movies of yesteryear.”
“If there ever was a role that played perfectly to Pascal’s natural charisma, it’s Maxwell Lord.”
“Sadly, all that glittered in the franchise’s first outing is gone in Wonder Woman 1984. The disappointing sequel highlights not only the dire state of the live-action superhero genre in film, but the dire state of Hollywood filmmaking as a whole.”
Consciousness Markers
Female director, female protagonist, and supporting cast includes diverse actors (Amr Waked, Natasha Rothwell), though the film's commitment to substantive representation appears limited by its generic obligations.
No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation evident in the film's plot or cast.
Female-centered narrative with a female protagonist and director, but the film treats potential feminist themes about female rivalry and desire with surface-level treatment rather than substantive interrogation.
While the cast includes actors of various backgrounds, the film demonstrates minimal engagement with racial themes or consciousness in its narrative or character development.
No climate change or environmental themes present in the film.
Maxwell Lord's character represents greed and capitalist ambition, but the film's critique of wealth and exploitation remains abstract and lacks force or systematic interrogation.
No body positivity themes or commentary evident in the film.
No representation of neurodivergence or relevant thematic engagement.
The 1980s setting is used primarily for aesthetic and narrative purposes without engaging in revisionist historical commentary.
The film contains occasional moments where it pauses to address themes of ambition and desire, but these moments lack the preachy insistence typical of high lecture energy.