WMS

Top Gun

1986 · Directed by Tony Scott · $5.0M domestic

🧘2

Woke Score

50

Critic

🍿71

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 48 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1173 of 1469.

🎭🏳️‍🌈👑🌱💰💗🧠📖📢
Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

For Lieutenant Pete 'Maverick' Mitchell and his friend and co-pilot Nick 'Goose' Bradshaw, being accepted into an elite training school for fighter pilots is a dream come true. But a tragedy, as well as personal demons, will threaten Pete's dreams of becoming an ace pilot.

Consciousness Assessment

Top Gun remains a monument to Reagan-era military triumphalism, a film so thoroughly committed to the project of celebrating American technological superiority and masculine heroism that it barely registers as existing in the same universe as contemporary cultural consciousness. The film's casting is uniformly white, its narrative orbit centers exclusively on male achievement and rivalry, and its only female character serves as a romantic objective rather than a fully realized human being. Kelly McGillis' aeronautical engineer exists to validate the protagonist's emotional growth through romantic attachment, a narrative function rather than a character.

The film's politics are those of 1986, not 2024. There is no attempt to interrogate military values, no consideration of whose wars are being fought, no examination of the systems that produce these warriors. The movie is a two-hour enlistment advertisement wrapped in Kenny Loggins and jet fuel. The famous volleyball sequence, now read by modern audiences as inadvertently homoerotic, was shot with no apparent awareness of how its slow-motion athleticism and male physicality would register to viewers decades later. This is not social consciousness, progressive or otherwise. This is pure product of its moment.

The minor score reflects that Top Gun makes no gesture whatsoever toward the markers of contemporary progressive sensibility. It predates this entire category of cultural concern by a generation. Scoring it on a scale designed to measure 2020s cultural anxieties is like asking a 1986 film review to discuss its use of AI ethics or blockchain representation. The film exists in a different conceptual universe, and that is precisely why it scores so low.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

50%from 15 reviews
Empire80

Top Gun is not so much a movie in the conventional sense as an escalating series of masterfully crafted adverts: motorcycles, aircraft carriers, pectorals and planes all look as if they’ve been shot for a particularly luminous beer campaign.

Adam SmithRead Full Review →
Variety80

Set in the world of naval fighter pilots, pic has strong visuals and pretty young people in stylish clothes and a non-stop soundtrack.

Staff (Not Credited)Read Full Review →
Entertainment Weekly75

Top Gun has always been more than just an action flick about a cocky young fighter pilot who feels the need for speed.

Chris NashawatyRead Full Review →
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)25

There is no acting to speak of (and to speak of Cruise's performance at all would be embarrassing) but there is a point of view. This is yet another Ramboesque instalment in the current American obsession with might making right. As a movie, Top Gun is negligible and near ridiculous; as a cultural phenomenon, it is sobering and faintly frightening. [16 May 1986, p.C5]

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting2

The cast is almost entirely white and male. Kelly McGillis is the sole female principal character, and she is not a pilot herself but rather a civilian love interest.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

There are no LGBTQ characters or themes. The film's subtext is entirely heterosexual competition and rivalry among men.

👑
Feminist Agenda1

The female character exists as a romantic prize for the male protagonist. She has no independent arc or meaningful agency in the narrative.

Racial Consciousness0

The film shows no awareness of racial dynamics whatsoever. The cast is overwhelmingly white, and race is not acknowledged as a category of interest.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

The film celebrates military aviation and technological power with no consideration of environmental impact or climate concerns.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The film is fundamentally pro-military and pro-American capitalism, celebrating the defense industry and military might.

💗
Body Positivity0

The film celebrates an extremely narrow standard of masculine physical perfection. There is no consideration of diverse body types.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

Neurodivergence is not addressed or represented in any way.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film does not attempt to reframe historical events. It is a fictional narrative set during the Cold War with no historical revisionism.

📢
Lecture Energy1

The film is mostly action and spectacle, though there are a few scenes where characters explain flying or emotional concepts in fairly direct terms.