WMS

Tomb Raider

2018 · Directed by Roar Uthaug

🧘12

Woke Score

48

Critic

🍿62

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 36 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1194 of 1469.

🎭🏳️‍🌈👑🌱💰💗🧠📖📢
Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

Lara Croft, the fiercely independent daughter of a missing adventurer, must push herself beyond her limits when she finds herself on the island where her father disappeared.

Consciousness Assessment

Tomb Raider exists in that peculiar space occupied by many contemporary action films: it has a female protagonist and therefore believes itself progressive, but operates entirely within the framework of traditional adventure cinema. Alicia Vikander's Lara Croft is undoubtedly tough, capable, and central to the narrative, yet the film treats her competence as a neutral fact rather than a statement. She wears practical clothing, handles weapons, and rescues herself, which are all fine things for any protagonist to do, but they do not constitute cultural consciousness so much as basic storytelling necessity. The island setting is generic, the plot mechanics are borrowed from the video game source material without interrogation or recontextualization, and the surrounding cast exists primarily to facilitate her journey. The film is not hostile to progressive sensibilities, but neither does it appear particularly interested in them.

The narrative is straightforward: paternal abandonment and filial determination. Lara's motivation is familial rather than ideological. She discovers that her father was engaged in morally ambiguous work, pursues him across the globe, and proves her worth through physical prowess and determination. This is fundamentally a story about inheritance and legitimacy rather than about anything approaching contemporary cultural discourse. The film is competently made and reasonably entertaining, succeeding at being a video game adaptation without embarrassing itself, but it traffics in none of the markers that would suggest genuine engagement with modern progressive frameworks. The supporting cast includes characters of various ethnic backgrounds, but their presence feels incidental rather than intentional. Walton Goggins plays a villain with no particular complexity. Daniel Wu appears without fanfare. Kristin Scott Thomas lends gravitas to underwritten material. None of this signals anything beyond the baseline diversity one might encounter in any contemporary Hollywood production.

The film's relationship to its female protagonist is perhaps most telling in what it does not do. There is no examination of gendered violence, no commentary on female autonomy, no interrogation of how a woman navigates male-dominated spaces, no dialogue about her body or her choices beyond what the plot demands. She is simply the hero, and the film treats this as unremarkable. This is admirable in certain respects: the absence of comment is itself a kind of statement. But it is not the statement that contemporary progressive sensibilities would recognize as their own. Tomb Raider has absorbed the surface-level fact that women can be action heroes, but has not absorbed or chosen not to engage with the philosophical frameworks that might accompany such a choice. It is a film about a woman, not a film about womanhood or about the cultural position of women. That distinction matters.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

48%from 52 reviews
Slate80

An obligatory setup for a sequel slows down the final moments, but until then, Tomb Raider feels like a perfectly paced trio of espresso shots, with a shot of adrenaline to the heart as a chaser.

Inkoo KangRead Full Review →
Entertainment Weekly75

Uthaug also manages to work in a few genuinely cool visual tricks, though the dialogue, from a serviceable script by Geneva Robertson-Dworet and Alastair Siddons is strictly standard; a mix of clunky action-movie exposition and winking Indiana Jones-style humor.

Leah GreenblattRead Full Review →
St. Louis Post-Dispatch75

Director Roar Uthaug (“The Wave”) delivers a state-of-the-art popcorn flick that’s at its best when the focus is on the spunky Lara rather than the special effects.

Calvin WilsonRead Full Review →
Wall Street Journal10

Ms. Vikander has leapt into the void of a franchise reboot, based on a video-game reboot, that generates no joy, makes negligible sense, and seals its own tomb with a climax of perfect absurdity.

Joe MorgensternRead Full Review →

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting35

Female lead in action role, though treated as unremarkable rather than deliberately progressive. Supporting cast includes actors of color but their presence feels incidental rather than intentional.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or references are present in the film.

👑
Feminist Agenda15

Female protagonist is capable and independent, but the film does not engage with feminist frameworks, gender commentary, or interrogation of female agency. Her competence is presented as unremarkable.

Racial Consciousness5

Supporting cast includes actors of various ethnicities, but there is no engagement with racial themes or consciousness. Their presence is background detail rather than meaningful representation.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No climate-related themes or environmental consciousness are present in the film.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The film contains no anti-capitalist messaging or critique of wealth and economic systems.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body positivity themes are present. The film does not engage with body representation or acceptance.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergent characters or themes are represented in the film.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film does not engage in revisionist history or reexamination of historical narratives.

📢
Lecture Energy10

Minimal expository dialogue about social themes. The film operates in straightforward action-adventure mode without significant preachiness, though it occasionally verges on basic character motivation exposition.