WMS

The Princess Diaries

2001 · Directed by Garry Marshall

🧘15

Woke Score

52

Critic

🍿68

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 37 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1111 of 1469.

🎭🏳️‍🌈👑🌱💰💗🧠📖📢
Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

A socially awkward but very bright 15-year-old girl being raised by a single mom discovers that she is the princess of a small European country because of the recent death of her long-absent father, who, unknown to her, was the crown prince of Genovia. She must make a choice between continuing the life of a San Francisco teen or stepping up to the throne.

Consciousness Assessment

The Princess Diaries occupies a peculiar position in the contemporary cultural timeline, released a full fifteen years before the specific social consciousness markers we now associate with progressive cinema became dominant. This is a film that predates the entire apparatus by which we might measure such things, which itself becomes the most honest way to assess it. What we observe is a 2001 family comedy operating in its own context, which is to say, a fundamentally different context.

The film presents a female protagonist who exercises agency, certainly, but within parameters that would now read as limited. Mia Thermopolis rejects initial pressure to conform, then accepts a rather thorough makeover that renders her acceptably feminine for royal society. The arc is not feminist in the contemporary sense so much as it is a girl learning to navigate existing power structures rather than dismantling them. She becomes a better princess, not a revolutionary. The casting includes Sandra Oh and other performers of color, but they exist in the narrative without commentary on their presence. This is not representation as a deliberate statement so much as representation as incidental fact.

The film's earnestness is perhaps its defining feature. There is no lecture energy, no sense that the audience is being instructed in proper thinking. Julie Andrews and Anne Hathaway share scenes that are simply warm and sincere. The makeover montage, now frequently read as problematic in its suggestion that transformation is necessary, was presented in 2001 as something closer to a fairy tale tradition. To score this film as if it were made in 2024 would be a category error. It is a period piece, though not in the way that term typically functions. It is a period piece of early-2000s sensibility, and as such, it scores low on contemporary progressive markers. This is not a moral failing of the film. It is simply what it is.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

52%from 27 reviews
Entertainment Weekly83

This charming, if unnecessarily coronation-length production gets the duckling-to-swan ambivalence just right.

Lisa SchwarzbaumRead Full Review →
Los Angeles Times80

This stylish Disney production is an ideal family film.

Kevin ThomasRead Full Review →
USA Today75

Isn't always perfect. But it fills an empty spot in the hearts of girls of all ages who have been pining all summer for a movie like this.

Susan WloszczynaRead Full Review →
Salon20

Such weak medicine. Sure enough, it goes down. Keeping it down is another matter.

Stephanie ZacharekRead Full Review →

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting35

The film features Sandra Oh in a supporting role and a diverse ensemble, but casting appears organic to the narrative rather than consciously implemented for representation purposes. No explicit acknowledgment of diversity as a value.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or subtext present in the film. The narrative is entirely heteronormative.

👑
Feminist Agenda25

The female protagonist has agency and makes her own choices, but the narrative arc remains centered on romantic fulfillment and makeover transformation. The film critiques shallow beauty standards but ultimately endorses polishing oneself for social acceptance.

Racial Consciousness0

No racial consciousness or commentary on race present in the film. Characters of color exist in the narrative without explicit racial themes or discussion.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No climate themes, environmental consciousness, or ecological messaging appears in the film.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The narrative celebrates wealth, royalty, and privilege without critique. No anti-capitalist sentiment or class consciousness is present.

💗
Body Positivity20

The film initially celebrates the protagonist's authenticity before a significant makeover sequence, but ultimately frames the transformation as positive. This reflects pre-2010s sensibilities rather than modern body positivity advocacy.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No neurodivergent characters or themes related to neurodivergence are present in the film.

📖
Revisionist History0

No historical revisionism or reframing of past events. The film is a contemporary fantasy with no historical dimension.

📢
Lecture Energy5

The film is earnest and sincere rather than preachy. There are mild moments of the protagonist learning lessons about responsibility and duty, but no preachy or instructional tone dominates the narrative.