WMS

The Autopsy of Jane Doe

2016 · Directed by André Øvredal

🧘4

Woke Score

65

Critic

🍿69

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 61 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #764 of 1469.

🎭🏳️‍🌈👑🌱💰💗🧠📖📢
Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

Father and son coroners receive a mysterious unidentified corpse with no apparent cause of death. As they attempt to examine the "Jane Doe," they discover increasingly bizarre clues that hold the key to her terrifying secrets.

Consciousness Assessment

The Autopsy of Jane Doe is a tightly constructed horror film that, in its relentless focus on the violation of a female corpse by male professionals, offers a genuinely disquieting meditation on the objectification of women's bodies. The film's entire running time consists of two men examining, measuring, and dissecting the remains of a woman who cannot speak, consent, or resist. She is, literally and figuratively, a blank slate onto which their interpretations are projected. This setup could be read as a critique of male-dominated institutional violence, yet the film presents it primarily as visceral horror spectacle rather than as social commentary. The supernatural elements that emerge complicate the narrative, but they do not fundamentally reframe the underlying dynamic of bodily violation.

From the perspective of contemporary cultural markers, the film remains remarkably indifferent to progressive sensibilities. The cast is predominantly white, the female character exists only as an object of investigation, and no attempt is made to interrogate the gendered power dynamics at play. The film's horror derives not from an examination of institutional misogyny but from the grotesque and the inexplicable. It is, in other words, a straightforward horror exercise that happens to center on a dead woman, rather than a film that uses its premise to examine gendered violence as a social phenomenon.

The film's modest woke score reflects its fundamental disinterest in social consciousness. It is neither progressive nor regressive, but rather apolitical in its approach to its subject matter. This is not a criticism of the film's artistic merit, which is considerable, but rather an observation about its relationship to the contemporary cultural moment.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

65%from 20 reviews
The New York Times80

Gruesome without being gory, The Autopsy of Jane Doe achieves real scares with a minimum of special effects.

Jeannette CatsoulisRead Full Review →
Empire80

Featuring excellent work from grandstanding Cox and just-lying-there Kelly, The Autopsy Of Jane Doe creates a successful feeling of mounting dread punctuated by crashing thunder and surgical viscera.

Kim NewmanRead Full Review →
Total Film80

André Øvredal (Troll Hunter) ruthlessly ratchets the tension – with no little assistance from Olwen Kelly, conveying menace without moving a muscle.

Neil SmithRead Full Review →
The Playlist25

‘Jane Doe’ never aspires beyond the ordinary, and more crucially even fails to meet that modest standard. Lifeless and lackluster, ‘Jane Doe’ never draws blood.

Kevin JagernauthRead Full Review →

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting0

The cast is predominantly white and male. The female protagonist is literally a corpse with no dialogue or agency, existing only to be examined by male professionals.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation present in the film.

👑
Feminist Agenda20

The film's central image is a female body being dissected and violated by male authority figures in a confined space. While this could be read as critiquing male violence, the film presents this as horror spectacle rather than as conscious examination of gendered violence.

Racial Consciousness0

No racial themes, racial consciousness, or meaningful diversity in casting. The film does not engage with race as a social construct.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No climate-related themes or environmental consciousness present in this supernatural horror film.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The film contains no critique of capitalism, wealth inequality, or economic systems.

💗
Body Positivity0

The film's entire premise revolves around the grotesque violation and mutilation of a female body. This is antithetical to body positivity messaging.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No representation of or engagement with neurodivergence, mental health, or neurodivergent characters.

📖
Revisionist History0

This is a contemporary supernatural horror film with no historical setting or revisionist historical claims.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film does not attempt to educate, lecture, or deliver moral instruction to the audience about social issues.