WMS

Poltergeist

1982 · Directed by Tobe Hooper

🧘4

Woke Score

47

Critic

🍿41

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 43 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1233 of 1469.

🎭🏳️‍🌈👑🌱💰💗🧠📖📢
Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

The Freelings' suburban home becomes the center of paranormal activity that opens a portal to the 'other side'. With help, they must cross over to get their daughter back.

Consciousness Assessment

Poltergeist stands as a monument to 1980s horror filmmaking, which is to say it stands as a monument to filmmaking almost entirely unconcerned with the social consciousness that would later become commonplace in progressive cinema. The film's suburban white family serves as the narrative anchor, and their trials function as universal horror rather than as a vehicle for cultural critique. One observes no meaningful attention to diverse representation, no exploration of gender beyond traditional nuclear family dynamics, and no engagement with the specific political implications of its own central conceit.

The film's single notable element is its incidental commentary on suburban development and land appropriation, triggered by the revelation that the Freeling home sits atop a Native American burial ground. This setup could have generated meaningful historical reflection, yet it remains purely functional to the plot. The indigenous population exists only as a supernatural force, never as people deserving of actual consideration or representation. The desecration of their sacred ground serves as the explanation for hauntings rather than as the opportunity for serious reckoning with American historical injustice.

Poltergeist is a technically accomplished thriller that demonstrates mastery of suspense and practical effects. It is not a film that concerns itself with who occupies the screen, what messages are embedded in its narrative, or what cultural values it might reinforce. In the vocabulary of contemporary cultural assessment, this renders it nearly invisible on the spectrum of progressive social consciousness. It is simply a very effective haunted house story, which is precisely what it set out to be.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

47%from 27 reviews
The Hollywood Reporter70

While Hooper favored shock value and jump scares, Kenan and cinematographer Javier Aguirresarobe construct far more fluid sequences as the camera glides and hovers over its subjects, reserving the most impactful shots for the climactic scenes, particularly a concluding sequence that’s particularly thrilling.

Justin LoweRead Full Review →
Entertainment Weekly67

The only really frightening thing about the 2015 version of Poltergeist is how haunted it is by the original.

Clark CollisRead Full Review →
New York Post63

This serviceable remake sticks fairly closely and smartly to the same plot, with the same scary objects and even the line, “They’re here.”

Kyle SmithRead Full Review →
Washington Post25

To call Poltergeist laughable is not the same thing as saying it’s bad (although it is that, too.) It’s just that it seems less interested in scaring you than in making you chuckle. At least on that score it succeeds.

Michael O'SullivanRead Full Review →

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting5

The cast is predominantly white and reflects 1980s mainstream Hollywood defaults. No deliberate attention to diverse casting or representation is evident.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation appear in the film. The narrative is entirely heteronormative.

👑
Feminist Agenda3

The mother character is a homemaker while the father works in real estate. Gender roles remain largely traditional, though the mother demonstrates agency in fighting supernatural threats.

Racial Consciousness10

The film references Native American burial ground desecration but treats it as supernatural plot mechanism rather than historical injustice deserving serious engagement.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental themes or climate-related messaging present in the film.

💰
Eat the Rich2

The father's work in real estate development could invite critique of capitalism, but the film presents no anti-capitalist sentiment or systemic critique.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body positivity themes or commentary appear. The film contains no engagement with body image or disability representation.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No representation of neurodivergence or disability is present in the narrative.

📖
Revisionist History5

The Native American burial ground element could constitute historical revisionism, but it functions primarily as supernatural plot device without deliberate historical reframing.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film contains no preachy messaging, social lectures, or attempts to educate the audience about progressive values.