WMS

North by Northwest

1959 · Directed by Alfred Hitchcock

🧘4

Woke Score

98

Critic

🍿84

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 94 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #23 of 1469.

🎭🏳️‍🌈👑🌱💰💗🧠📖📢
Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

Advertising man Roger Thornhill is mistaken for a spy, triggering a deadly cross-country chase.

Consciousness Assessment

North by Northwest emerges from an era when cinema had not yet developed the lexicon of contemporary progressive sensibilities. Hitchcock's 1959 thriller is a meticulously crafted machine designed to generate suspense through mistaken identity and cross-country pursuit. The film reflects the Cold War anxieties of its moment: paranoia about government, concern over nuclear proliferation, and the specter of communist infiltration. These are the preoccupations of 1959, not 2024.

The female characters present a study in the conventions of their era. Eva Marie Saint's Valerie Kendall is seductive and intelligent, though she functions primarily as a romantic interest within a narrative engine that belongs entirely to Cary Grant's Roger Thornhill. She exists to be pursued, saved, and ultimately won. Jessie Royce Landis plays Thornhill's mother as comic relief, a stock figure of emasculating domesticity. Neither character exhibits the agency or interiority that contemporary progressive cinema would demand. The film makes no apparent effort to subvert these dynamics, nor does it seem aware that such subversion might be desirable.

In matters of racial representation, the cast is uniformly white, reflecting both the production practices and audience demographics of Hollywood in 1959. The supporting players are entirely European-American. There is no attempt at diverse casting, no acknowledgment of non-white existence, no celebration of multicultural identity. The film simply does not see these categories as relevant. This is not an indictment of Hitchcock personally, but rather a straightforward observation about the film's cultural blindness. It was made in 1959. It shows it.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

98%from 16 reviews
The Telegraph100

There’s a superabundance of sparkling, often marvellously terse one-liners (when asked what the “O” stands for, Thornhill’s resigned and emotionally relevant answer is, “Nothing”) – and, my, how wittily Grant delivers them.

Mark MonahanRead Full Review →
Empire100

This is Hitchcock's longest film and also his most self-referential. Little jokes abound about art and artifice, role play and reality, duty and duplicity and each viewing reveals something new to enhance the pleasure of watching the Master of Suspense at his most mischievous and assured.

David ParkinsonRead Full Review →
The Hollywood Reporter100

This film is pure entertainment.

Jack MoffittRead Full Review →
Time Out80

Hitchcock breezes through a tongue-in-cheek, nightmarish plot with a lightness of touch that’s equalled by a charming performance from Grant (below), who copes effortlessly with the script’s dash between claustrophobia and intrigue on one hand and romance and comedy on the other.

Dave CalhounRead Full Review →