
Neighbors
2014 · Directed by Nicholas Stoller
Woke Score
CriticCritic Score
Audience
Ultra Based
Critics rated this 64 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #674 of 1469.
Representation Casting
Score: 25/100
Rose Byrne is a co-lead rather than a supporting character, providing some gender representation in a male-dominated comedy genre. However, this reflects comedic parity rather than conscious progressive casting.
LGBTQ+ Themes
Score: 0/100
No LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or representation present in the film.
Feminist Agenda
Score: 10/100
Kelly participates equally in the conflict with the fraternity, but the film makes no effort to examine gender dynamics or power structures. This is comedic egalitarianism, not feminist consciousness.
Racial Consciousness
Score: 0/100
The cast is predominantly white, and race is never addressed or acknowledged as a meaningful category in the film.
Climate Crusade
Score: 0/100
No engagement with climate, environmental concerns, or ecological awareness.
Eat the Rich
Score: 0/100
No critique of capitalism, wealth, or economic systems. The film focuses on suburban property disputes.
Body Positivity
Score: 0/100
The film relies on bodily humor and physical comedy without any commitment to body positivity messaging.
Neurodivergence
Score: 0/100
No representation of or engagement with neurodivergent characters or experiences.
Revisionist History
Score: 0/100
Not a historical film. No attempt to reinterpret or recontextualize historical events.
Lecture Energy
Score: 0/100
The film contains no preachy or preachy moments. It avoids moral instruction in favor of pure comedy.
Synopsis
A couple with a newborn baby face unexpected difficulties after they are forced to live next to a fraternity house.
Consciousness Assessment
Neighbors is a 2014 comedy that operates entirely outside the orbit of contemporary progressive consciousness. While the film features Rose Byrne as a genuine co-lead rather than a supporting romantic interest, this choice reflects standard comedic parity rather than any commitment to feminist examination. Kelly Radner participates equally in the escalating conflict with the fraternity next door, but the film treats this as a matter of comedic convenience, not social commentary. The humor derives from bodily functions, male aggression, and fraternity chaos played for laughs, with no attempt to interrogate the structures or power dynamics at play.
The cast is predominantly white, and their whiteness is never remarked upon or interrogated. There are no LGBTQ+ characters, no discussion of racial identity, no engagement with climate, capitalism, or neurodiversity. The film's universe is one of pure, consequence-free comedy in which parenthood is an inconvenience and suburban life is a setup for destruction. This is a comedy that could have been released in 2004 or 2024 without significant modification to its sensibilities.
The film's indifference to social consciousness is not a failing, merely an observation. It is competently made and commercially successful, operating within the parameters of mainstream comedy. Yet it bears no marks of the progressive cultural sensibilities that became increasingly visible in Hollywood by the late 2010s. It is culturally inert, committed only to the mechanics of comedy.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Critic Reviews
“Not only is it uproariously funny and almost breathtakingly dirty, it is better written than it needs to be on a character level, delivering completely on its premise.”
“What makes Neighbors exceptional, rather than merely great, is its successful attempt to reinvent the studio comedy.”
“Neighbors is one of the funniest, most visually inventive studio comedies in recent memory.”
“Neighbors stakes its claim in suburban-property cliches. Given the dull, stale results, maybe the end of the world was a better fit. ”
Consciousness Markers
Rose Byrne is a co-lead rather than a supporting character, providing some gender representation in a male-dominated comedy genre. However, this reflects comedic parity rather than conscious progressive casting.
No LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or representation present in the film.
Kelly participates equally in the conflict with the fraternity, but the film makes no effort to examine gender dynamics or power structures. This is comedic egalitarianism, not feminist consciousness.
The cast is predominantly white, and race is never addressed or acknowledged as a meaningful category in the film.
No engagement with climate, environmental concerns, or ecological awareness.
No critique of capitalism, wealth, or economic systems. The film focuses on suburban property disputes.
The film relies on bodily humor and physical comedy without any commitment to body positivity messaging.
No representation of or engagement with neurodivergent characters or experiences.
Not a historical film. No attempt to reinterpret or recontextualize historical events.
The film contains no preachy or preachy moments. It avoids moral instruction in favor of pure comedy.