WMS

Mission: Impossible (1996)

Directed by Brian De Palma

🧘8

No · Ultra Based

How we score movies →

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting25

The ensemble includes some diversity with Ving Rhames and international actors, but the narrative remains centered on Tom Cruise with supporting female characters who lack agency or complexity.

👑
Feminist Agenda15

Female characters exist in secondary roles but lack agency. Kristin Scott Thomas and Vanessa Redgrave are competent but not central to the narrative or moral questions.

Racial Consciousness10

While Ving Rhames appears in the ensemble, the film demonstrates no particular awareness of race or racial dynamics in its storytelling.

📢
Lecture Energy5

The film is plot-driven rather than message-driven, with minimal moralizing or preachy intent.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ representation or themes present in the film.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No environmental themes or climate-related messaging present.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The film is a straightforward CIA thriller with no critique of capitalism or institutional power structures.

💗
Body Positivity0

Standard action film with conventionally attractive leads, no body diversity or positivity messaging.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No representation of neurodivergent characters or conditions.

📖
Revisionist History0

While set against a CIA backdrop, the film does not attempt to reframe or revisit historical events.

Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

When Ethan Hunt, the leader of a crack espionage team whose perilous operation has gone awry with no explanation, discovers that a mole has penetrated the CIA, he's surprised to learn that he's the prime suspect. To clear his name, Hunt now must ferret out the real double agent and, in the process, even the score.

Why it received this score

Mission: Impossible stands as a monument to the pre-social consciousness action thriller, a film so thoroughly committed to plot mechanics and star power that it barely acknowledges the existence of any world beyond the immediate narrative. Brian De Palma's 1996 exercise in espionage paranoia is a machine designed to deliver set pieces: impossible masks, Prague rooftops, that aquarium sequence. The film contains women, certainly, but they exist primarily to be recruited, betrayed, or rescued rather than to complicate the moral landscape.

The ensemble cast includes Jean Reno and Ving Rhames, yet the film demonstrates no particular consciousness about what these actors represent or might bring to questions of representation. They are simply competent operatives in a competent machine. Kristin Scott Thomas and Vanessa Redgrave appear in roles that would not be substantially altered if male actors inhabited them. This is not malice so much as indifference, a 1996 sensibility that viewed the action thriller as a space for pure entertainment divorced from any awareness of who filled which roles or what that filling might signify.

The film registers as almost comically innocent of progressive sensibilities. There is no environmental messaging, no anti-capitalist rhetoric, no examination of institutional power beyond the immediate plot. Even the CIA functions as a neutral institutional backdrop rather than an object of critique. Mission: Impossible exists in a sealed bubble, asking only that we follow Ethan Hunt through increasingly elaborate scenarios. In the vocabulary of contemporary cultural assessment, it registers as essentially neutral, a period artifact that makes no claim upon our social consciousness whatsoever.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

59%from 29 reviews
Empire100

Enormous fun.

Mark SalisburyRead Full Review →
Tampa Bay Times100

Stealth is a key element of tension and, even though DePalma tosses his share of fireballs around, Mission: Impossible gets edgier when it gets quieter. The audience's rapt, empathetic silence while Hunt hangs there in peril proves how well the director does it. [24 May 1996, p.5]

Steve PersallRead Full Review →
Salon90

Director Brian De Palma is having too much fun zipping around curves and hitting the accelerator to slow down. He's a supremely confident engineer, and if you're game enough to make a jump for it and hold on, he offers the giddy excitement of watching the ground rush by beneath your dangling feet.

Charles TaylorRead Full Review →
San Francisco Chronicle25

It's the worst kind of convoluted thriller -- it can never unravel satisfactorily because there's nothing simple at its center, just more confusion.

Mick LaSalleRead Full Review →

Related rankings