WMS

Looper

2012 · Directed by Rian Johnson

🧘4

Woke Score

84

Critic

🍿76

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 80 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #269 of 1469.

🎭🏳️‍🌈👑🌱💰💗🧠📖📢
Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

In the year 2044, time travel has not yet been invented but in 30 years it will have been. When the mob wants to get rid of someone, they will send their target into the past where a looper, a hired gun, like Joe is waiting to mop up. Joe is getting rich and life is good until the day the mob decides to close the loop, sending back Joe's future self for assassination.

Consciousness Assessment

Looper arrives as a precisely engineered science fiction thriller with no interest in contemporary cultural consciousness whatsoever. The film concerns itself with time travel paradoxes, contract killing, and the moral reckoning that arrives when a young assassin confronts his older self. These are timeless noir preoccupations, executed with considerable craft and narrative ingenuity, but they float free from any engagement with progressive social frameworks. The 2012 release date places this comfortably before the cultural moment that would define modern progressive sensibilities, and the film shows no inclination to anticipate or explore those territories.

Emily Blunt appears as Sara, a single mother and farmer who becomes entangled in the protagonist's crisis. She is written as a capable, intelligent character with her own agency and motivations. However, her presence reflects standard Hollywood casting practice rather than any deliberate commitment to progressive representation or feminist consciousness. The film's moral universe remains focused on individual choice, male violence, and temporal mechanics. It does not invite us to interrogate systems of power or cultural hierarchies. The supporting cast, predominantly white, exists within a criminal underworld that is never racialized or commented upon in terms of social consciousness.

The film's greatest sin, from the perspective of progressive cultural analysis, is its complete indifference to the entire project. It is a work of entertainment that trusts narrative momentum and thematic coherence to carry the day. Whether one admires this or finds it deficient depends entirely on one's expectations for what cinema should accomplish. What remains clear is that Looper operates in an entirely different register from the cultural moment that would later preoccupy critics and audiences alike.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

84%from 44 reviews
Boxoffice Magazine100

Director Rian Johnson's resulting film, a cornfield neo-noir, is the coolest, most-confident sci-fi flick since 2006's "Children of Men."

Amy NicholsonRead Full Review →
Total Film100

The best sci-fi movie since "Moon." The best time-travel yarn since "12 Monkeys." And one of the best films of 2012. You'll immediately want to see it again.

James MottramRead Full Review →
Empire100

Intelligent science-fiction sometimes seems an endangered species - too much physics and there's a risk of creating something cold and remote, too many explosions and get lost in the multiplex. Looper isn't perfect, but it pulls off the full Wizard Of Oz: it has a brain, courage and a heart.

Kim NewmanRead Full Review →
Slate50

Looper felt to me like a maddening near-miss: It posits an impossible but fascinating-to-imagine relationship...and then throws away nearly all the dramatic potential that relationship offers. If someone remakes Looper as the movie it could have been in, say, 30 years, will someone from the future please FedEx it back to me?

Dana StevensRead Full Review →