WMS

Is Knowing (2009) Woke?

Knowing · 2009 · Directed by Alex Proyas

🧘4

Woke Score

⭐41

Critic

🍿58

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 37 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1359 of 1503.

Answer: No

Woke Score 4/100 · Verdict: Ultra Based

Strongest markers: Feminist Agenda (5)

How we score movies →
Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score
Director: Alex Proyas
Cast: Nicolas Cage, Rose Byrne, Chandler Canterbury, Ben Mendelsohn, Nadia Townsend, Terry Camilleri, Lara Robinson, Adrienne Pickering
Genres: Action, Mystery, Science Fiction, Thriller
Studios: Summit Entertainment, Escape Artists, Mystery Clock Cinema, Kaplan/Perrone Entertainment, Wintergreen Productions, Goldcrest
Franchise: null

Synopsis

A teacher opens a time capsule that has been dug up at his son's elementary school; in it are some chilling predictions -- some that have already occurred and others that are about to -- that lead him to believe his family plays a role in the events that are about to unfold.

Why it received this score

Knowing arrives as a straightforward apocalyptic thriller with no apparent interest in the cultural anxieties that would later define progressive cinema. The film concerns itself with disaster scenarios and numerological prophecy, treating these elements with the grim seriousness of a man who has just discovered that the universe is fundamentally indifferent to human agency. Nicolas Cage plays a widowed professor haunted by the implications of an 50-year-old time capsule, a premise that offers no natural entry point for contemporary social consciousness.

The cast consists of competent actors deployed in service of the plot machinery, not as vehicles for representation or diversified storytelling. Rose Byrne plays a mother figure, Chandler Canterbury his son, and the ensemble serves the narrative requirements without commentary on identity, power structures, or systemic inequity. The film's apocalyptic finale embraces a quasi-religious vision of salvation that has more in common with traditional science fiction speculation than with modern progressive allegory.

This is a film about the end of the world, not about the world's various social problems. It asks whether humanity can know the future, not whether that future can be more equitable. One finds here neither LGBTQ+ representation, nor environmental consciousness deployed as thematic material, nor interrogation of power dynamics. What we have instead is a solidly constructed genre exercise from 2009, before such considerations became standard in mainstream cinema.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

41%from 27 reviews
Chicago Sun-Times100

“Knowing is among the best science-fiction films I've seen -- frightening, suspenseful, intelligent and, when it needs to be, rather awesome.”

— Roger EbertRead Full Review →
Film Threat70

“This is a severely flawed, but also a fascinating and engrossing science fiction film, a picture that offers far more than surface thrills.”

— Scott MendelsonRead Full Review →
Portland Oregonian67

“By being judicious with CGI, Proyas gives the film's handful of disaster sequences great impact.”

New York Daily News0

“Isn't prophetic ... just pathetic”

— Joe NeumaierRead Full Review →

Related rankings

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting0

Cast composition reflects conventional Hollywood demographics of 2009 without deliberate diversification or conscious representation strategy.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or subtext present in the film.

👑
Feminist Agenda5

Rose Byrne plays a capable mother figure, but the film shows no feminist consciousness or examination of gender dynamics.

✊
Racial Consciousness0

No thematic engagement with race, racism, or racial dynamics in the narrative.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

While the film depicts disaster scenarios, these are presented as apocalyptic prophecy rather than environmental commentary or climate consciousness.

💰
Eat the Rich0

No critique of capitalism, wealth inequality, or economic systems present in the film.

💗
Body Positivity0

No engagement with body diversity, body positivity, or commentary on physical appearance standards.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No representation of or thematic engagement with neurodivergent characters or neurodiversity.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film does not engage in historical revision or reframing of historical narratives.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film delivers exposition and plot information naturally through dialogue and action rather than preachy lectures on social issues.