WMS

Alice Through the Looking Glass

2016 · Directed by James Bobin

🧘4

Woke Score

34

Critic

🍿59

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 30 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1407 of 1469.

🎭🏳️‍🌈👑🌱💰💗🧠📖📢
Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

Alice Kingsleigh returns to Underland and faces a new adventure in saving the Mad Hatter.

Consciousness Assessment

Alice Through the Looking Glass arrives as a study in the mechanics of modern studio filmmaking, which is to say it is a film designed to be produced, marketed, and consumed rather than experienced. Director James Bobin, stepping in for Tim Burton, has constructed a $170 million visual apparatus in service of a narrative that exists primarily to justify its own existence as a sequel. The female protagonist motif, inherited from Lewis Carroll's source material, provides minimal contemporary progressive resonance, as Alice's agency serves the plot mechanics rather than any meaningful interrogation of gender dynamics or female autonomy. The film offers no commentary on systemic inequality, environmental collapse, or economic structures, instead opting for the safe, apolitical territory of whimsical fantasy spectacle. The cast, predominantly white and heteronormative, requires no special consideration for its composition beyond noting the absence of any deliberate diversification effort. This is a film that exists in a pre-2015 cultural register despite its 2016 release date, indifferent to the social consciousness that would define contemporary blockbuster discourse. The critical consensus, ranging from Roger Ebert's withering assessment of "professional" mediocrity to Variety's dismissal of the film as a "mercenary backward step," reflects the sense that we are observing pure commercial machinery rather than artistic expression. One watches it with the resigned awareness that it will generate considerable box office revenue regardless of its cultural inertia, a thought that provides its own species of melancholy.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

34%from 42 reviews
Entertainment Weekly67

For better or worse, Looking Glass loses none of the first film’s muchness, with Bobin mimicking both his predecessor’s wildly saturated style and his general disregard for plot and substance.

Leah GreenblattRead Full Review →
Christian Science Monitor67

The only heartfelt moment of this movie for me came in the end credits, with its dedication to the late Alan Rickman, who provided the voice for the blue butterfly (and former caterpillar) Absolem. What a voice, what an actor, what a loss.

Peter RainerRead Full Review →
New York Post63

You certainly get your 20 bucks worth of spectacle out of Alice Through the Looking Glass. So breathtaking are the landscapes, so whimsical are the creatures, so marvelous are the marvels that I wanted to give a standing ovation to whoever signed the check to pay for all this. Expensiver and expensiver!

Kyle SmithRead Full Review →
RogerEbert.com0

I removed my eyeballs from my head as soon as I got back from Alice Through the Looking Glass and cleaned them in a sink. I could have left them in and only cleaned the fronts, but I didn't want to take any chances.

Matt Zoller SeitzRead Full Review →

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting15

Features a female lead protagonist (Mia Wasikowska as Alice), but casting is predominantly white and offers no deliberate diversification beyond maintaining the character roster from the 2010 predecessor.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation present in the film.

👑
Feminist Agenda10

Female protagonist takes action to save the Mad Hatter, but this reflects source material adaptation rather than contemporary feminist commentary or interrogation of gender dynamics.

Racial Consciousness0

No racial consciousness, commentary on race relations, or deliberate racial representation beyond the inherited cast from the original film.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No climate themes, environmental messaging, or ecological consciousness present in the narrative.

💰
Eat the Rich0

No critique of capitalism, wealth inequality, or economic systems; the film is entirely apolitical regarding economic structures.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body positivity messaging or diverse body representation; characters conform to conventional Hollywood aesthetics.

🧠
Neurodivergence5

The Mad Hatter (Johnny Depp) exhibits eccentric behavior that could be interpreted as neurodivergence, but the character is played for whimsical comedy rather than meaningful representation or advocacy.

📖
Revisionist History0

No revisionist historical commentary or reframing of historical narratives; the film is a fantastical adaptation of fictional source material.

📢
Lecture Energy0

No preachy messaging, explicit social commentary, or 'lecture' moments regarding contemporary social issues or progressive values.